Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
At the end of the day, the whole awards system in and of itself was poorly thought out - for reviews as well as the forums. It should be removed completely from both of these venues.
I wouldn't mind the award system getting axed. it's anoying.
But honestly i'm more concerned with the negative social enforcement the system is catering to in it's current implementation. The jester is pretty much the biggest example of it.
Other people having mentioned the issue doesn't sound odd to me. Just that valve refuses to do anything about it.. Funny cause the current system makes moderation harder as a result of so many award farmers.
If people make troll threads, ignore those threads.
Secondly you cannot "know" the intent of the person giving the award instead you "assume" it is negative, malicious etc.
(INTENT: Something that is intended) - "No one is a mindreader to know the giver's intent".
In turn this leads to:
(ASSUME: To make a supposition; suppose or believe:) - As in, it fits your narrative to have it be negative malicious etc which goes back to "No one is a mindreader to know the giver's intent".
And finally you have to "prove" the intent of the giver but you cannot unless they actually state the reason why.
and the same gas lighting is brought out in retort every time
the "jester" is being used as "clown"
and "clown" is a common insult these days for "stupid" and "moron" and "idiot" etc.
any claim to the contrary is intentional malice
we have "hilarious" for anything funny.
the Discussion Guidelines state:
and yet the "clown" 🤡 award is being used as a means of anonymously harassing others.
consider valve to be either incompetent or negligent.
because despite this obvious misuse of the "jester" for years, they have done nothing about it.
if support ever tell you: they're lying
Awards are just another way Valve makes money, and expecting Valve to do the right thing is quite nieve