Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Which isn't the case, its really industry specific, the average ratio of tickets per user changes greatly based on the industry. Stores have more tickets and issues then banks for instance due to the transactional nature of the work they do.
Trying to compare two very different businesses never works well. I mean netflix charges a monthly fee to access content. So by that logic Steam should charge a monthly fee to access all the games they have on their store for free....
Yeah I used to work for a software company and I implemented our ticketing system, and we looked into live chat and It wasn't a good fit for us. The nature of our tickets we received required investigation and wasn't conductive to someone being on hold with how long they took to resolve on average.
A ticket system where they leave the issue and let us work on it without having them tied to a call or chat with us was far superior for the type of issues we dealt with. It freed them up to do other things while we worked on resolving their issues.
Also they don't need a live chat. The other places you mentioned have a chat bot which queues Tickets such as PayPal, so something that initially appears as live support is just automation & whatever can't be resolved through Automation like Steam, goes to an actual person to review & reply to.
Having worked in a place that had phone, chat & a Ticket system, you should only have a ticket system unless your queue is small enough to justify the use of chat without damaging the wait times of other systems - in which companies with high volume should only use a Ticket system unless other services are needed & can be resolved quickly.
YouTube has basically no support at all, often you get something looked at/resolved by people tagging them on twitter.
First hand experience says this is correct.
Banks rarely have calls from people.
Hardware & Software usually has a very high ticket volume unless around certain holidays. Something like Steam however, always has a strong surge during major holidays & sales for support queues - if they had live chat, the entire ticket queue time would be significantly longer.
Indeed. The experienced know why live chat & phone support is often non-existent compared to Tickets, or why phone or live chat is often reserved for very specific, likely easy to handle issues and in some cases reserved for business-to-business, just like how Valves own number is basically for business-to-business calls only.
https://ibb.co/mBpvTWt
That means Steam opted out of such features to pay them less money
Pretty much every big company in the world provides live chat support, whether through phone or text (or both).
Facebook doesn't have phone support or live chat.
Give me a ticket instead, at least i can do other stuff while i wait for a response.
And what do they sell?
That's exactly why most companies operate with both methods.
So they sell what?
You. You're the product.
Providing support on a social media platform where most use their own names and share personal information should be high priority, right? Not to mention all the companies and other entities that also have accounts there.
Yet they don't have support like that either. Perhaps phone and chat support isn't that necessary after all.