Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Why Let Australia get them? there are plently of american kids who have not yet been exposed to steam , or pcs, they are feeding the Nintendo and sony consoles billions, steam has a shot at getting itself into the market with console players and offering a chance to bring alot of users into a more mainstream linux based O.S.
spending money is pretty easy when you got 100's in cash or a credit card to swipe and can take it home with you the same day, vs wanting to put all your information into a website and wait several weeks to get the item.
Then hope it doesn't get stolen in transit or just simply "lost In the mail"
Steam could always send a few decks to each store and set up a order system via game stop, so customers could pay through game stop and steam could then send the item to the shop, it just makes it safer and gives customers a extra layer of protection.
keep in mind places like game stop don't take returns on console systems they would not take a return on a steam deck either, but at least the purchaser would get the item they bought.
Because lots of Steam-using Australians would really love to buy a Steam Deck, and it still hasn't been offered there. Previously, Valve partnered with EB Games to sell the Index in Australia, so there's precedent.
People in Australia can only purchase scalper ones.
I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm saying a priority should be for places that can't get it officially, like Asia did through Komodo.
64 gig DDR5 set ups are pretty cheap, under 1000 dollars for anyone who can build a pc, and we are talking top of the line I9 intel and 12GB dedicated Graphic cards.
pricing a system recently without the added fringes you could do it for under 1000 dollars.
steam deck for 350.00 - 500.00 at game stop would be great to see, it would give nintendo and ps5 some competition and might even get some good sales.
And prices at retail might not be the same as on Steam. Unless Valve wants to lose more money per sale.
As stated much easier to sell them in bulk to Australia, anyone who wanted one could easily get it via steam already. Buying an item via credit card and having it shipped isn't exactly challenging.....
so you might lose like 5% profit over all but you make the sale, plus it sets up a repeat customer who is going to buy things on the steam market place.
also and in the future with steam deck 2 you want to get people into buying steam decks so when steam deck 2 comes out in say 2 or 3 years people want to jump on that, at the same rate they do with ps and nintendo consoles.
its all about marketing and you can't market something that doesn't have exposed user groups.
ultimately and i see this every day, you are better off selling alot of something for cheaper, then a few expensive items. selling 100 items for 80% is better then selling 20 items at 100%
in steam decks case
100 items at 350 - its 35,000 dollars
at 20 items at 450 dollars is only 9,000 dollars
i don't think it costs steam 24,000 dollars to make 80 steam decks.
if they can't make a steam deck for under 300 dollars each there is no point in selling them. due to time factors any potental inventory is rapidly losing value due to hardware depreciation
It would finally be officially available in Australia rather than another place in the US, when they already have access to them, officially.
you can say its selling all you like, but today was the first time i actually talked to a real person who said they had a steam deck.
They're already making ALL the sales, it would make no sense to lose a cut of the profits.
Wouldn't all Deck sales do that?
But that's irrelevant if they're already selling 100% of what they're producing. They don't need to reduce the price to sell more because they're already selling them all. I feel like this can not be stressed enough.
But they're getting the sale anyway.
Except for anyone you see with a Deck exclusive profile. Or others who have flat out told you they own one.
something is off, im 100% sure Playstation and Nintendo would of failed if it had been mail order only, In Store sales represent well over 70% of purchases due to the likely random buying that customers do when they see things in the store.
if what all you are saying is true, steam deck is already at a profit loss, they don't make any money selling a 350 dollar steam deck, and are only profiting a little from the 600 dollar model on the deal they got for the m.2 chips.
which btw the m.2 chips are price dropping rapidly as well.
In my opinion the competive edge that steam had in the past is all but gone, this is now both hardware and software related as competive companies have released products and given games away to combat steams hold on the pc market gaming sales.
i think the fact that not many people are even showing up interested in this topic tells us that steam and steam decks are the last thing on there mind. that there just isn't really a huge population of people interested any more.
look with your own eye's, i don't see any random chat , just the same old steam forum users chiming in to say its a bad idea, so weird i just don't know about steam any more.
Why voluntarily lower profits for literally no benefit?
Dude. They're already selling ALL their Decks. How are you missing this?
They're selling more games than ever, they can't produce Decks fast enough to keep them in stock, but somehow they've lost their competitive edge?
And they're failing! So obviously Steam's not in the precarious position you seem to think they're in.
During the sale, Steam decks sold out in a matter of hours. That counts for a lot more than user participation in a silly thread.
Well, that's certainly clear.