Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In addition Microsoft has a sort of "compatibility" check in their store and that too is inaccurate. I've rechecked my standard example (Microsoft Flight Simulator and my wifes Elitebook) and it still clears that laptop as compatible, even though that it's CPU is underpowered and it doesn't have a dedicated GPU.
It's also not helped that listed specs aren't standardised. Minimum specs can mean "boots up", "decently playable" or "whatever I had". Take this game, for example:
Look at the minimum specs. The developer mentioned they put those minimum specs in because that's the lowest machine they had. I've played the game on a laptop that had a GT 745M as GPU and it ran fine on that.
Learn your specs and how they compare. My advice, based on years of gaming on a potato laptop, always is to use 3 of those canirunit sites and take the average result/advice as a guideline (at best). In time you'll learn to make educated guesses.
I've played quite some games on that potato laptop that all those canirunit sites said wouldn't work. Don't trust such systems, trust your own guts.
Type the name of the game, the cpu, and the gpu. Look at the results, they usually have it by resolution and settings.
Other than that, you need to get used to your hardware and expected performance. Different things can also vastly affect performance such as low ram, unstable oc, wrong system settings, too many running tasks/background tasks etc.
Knowing your own system and how it's running, how much it's running etc is a useful start.
Example...
Sure.
Steam already knows what kinda PC you're rocking, especially if you allowed them to collect stats, so they can very easily take those specs and compare them to the system requirements for you to have a better idea of how well a game will run.
It probably should come with a disclaimer that Steam's calculation should not be seen as a guarantee that the game will perform well, since PC gaming can be iffy at times because of the near infinite amount of possible setups. But for the most part, it should be pretty reliable.
From most to least problematic these would be:
1 - There's no standard on what 'minimum' and 'recommended' means in regards software performance
2 - The hardware fields are free text which menas there's no standard as how the information is set up by the developer. This makes any attempt to query it a nightmare
3 - It dumps liability on the Store if the system says a game 'runs' in your machine but turns out it doesn't
4 - The Store is device agnostic. You can browse and buy games from devices different than your gaming setup, which can lead to confusion.
That is not rude mate, he is simply telling you: it is what it is.
Acquiring knowlegde is part of becoming an adult, mate.
Eventually there will be nobody to hold your hand or wipe your @ss for you.... so the sooner you are able to stand on your own 2 feet & have the capability to make your own decisions, the better.
PS: get ready to know the 'specs' of your car, your phone, your internet, your mortgage, your energy bill, all your insurances, your taxes, your job contract, your rights as a citizen of your country etc etc etc etc etc Or simply choose to keep being ignorant & prepare to get scr*wed over & over your entire life.
Completely false. In fact Microsoft tried it years ago and quickly abandoned it as they realized that it wasn't remotely reliable as they had no clue how hardware would work on other people's games. Even the developers often don't know and it was wrong more then it was right without in depth scanning of people's PC.
It still doesn't work properly, that's true. As I mentioned, my wifes Elitebook with underpowered CPU and no dedicated GPU gets a green checkmark for Microsoft Flight Simulator, which is flatout wrong. (I checked it yesterday before making my previous post)
But it's not abandoned.
Ah I stand corrected, they had something years ago and it was removed, must have been brought back in another form at a later date. But yeah, its not really reliable and honestly surprised no one has tried suing them over it with how sue happy people are these days....
And facilitating purchases is part of being a successful store. The suggestion falls in line with Steam's prios.
Every single game store page already has minimum and recommended specs, the suggestion simply makes it easier for casual gamers to make a better decision.
Don't hold your breath OP, its a very unlikely scenario in part because its so nebulous. For instance for you what is your criteria for being able to run a game?