Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Most popular email services already do provide 2-step authorsiation. So forcing people to install crappy app, that is basically a mobile web browser, is not a security improvement but a security hole. And those mobile codes, they are calculated locally, so steam basically gave out their generation algorythm to hackers, and that is another security hole. Maybe steam actually wants for hackers to succeed? Because, no matter how you look at it, "for your own good" doesn't explain anything.
They are a combination of the local time and a shared secret number which only you and Steam have.
Without that shared number there is no way to use the algorithm to generate the correct code.
And before you say X authenticator doesn't work like that they ALL use the same implementation. The only difference between Steam and Google is they do 1 more step to turn a 6-8 digit number to 5 alphanumeric characters. Thats it. You do that step on what the Google Authenticator gives you (with the appropriate shared secret) and you would get the same result.
Ok, I'll stop reading now as you clearly not know what you're talking about.
1. as soon as the steam platform came out, changed my wording, hope your happy.
2. 77000 is not nothing, if that number is "low" by your standards then you have issues
Never said I did. Just said I don't use authenticators.
Sure, it could be done with an SMS service instead of a smartphone app, but it's not really like you're losing any worthwhile features. Trading worthless digital items wasn't even a thing until recently and it's not like you can't do it anymore with the current security measures.
You just wrote a lot, I don't really see any evidence for these wild claims while you speak for 90% of the Steam user base and claim we're all offended as if that supports any argument.
Are you seriously claiming some digital item which is worth less than a quarter is maiming people because the price can fluctuate by a penny?
Yes, for me they are over-bearing. But for people who are less security conscious it is a huge problem.
Maybe not the most worthwhile but it means the occasional free game over lengthy periods of time.
Actually thats exactly what I am saying. I can not sell my items anymore because of these new security features. I Don't generally bother anyways but sometimes I get the odd 1 pound worth item. And that does cover the cost of power to sell. But still. I can't anymore due to these changes.
I speak for myself, and every cringy anger filled post recently popping up comlaining about it.
Which seemingly are lots, not just on steam but other sites aswell.
I am known to overexagerate percentages. Although the 90% I mention is the percentage of people who have been locked out. Not 90% Of all steam users.
I for one am offended, some people who aren't using steam mobile auth are offended.
People who don't like to hear they require a mobile to use a PC program properly. Are offended.
Who is claiming alot of people getting hacked? I got that from steam themselves.
Where did I get the number from? Steam.
Where did I get the reason for these changes from? Steam
Who is saying they are doing this because the hackers / phishers what ever you want to call them? Steam
Who loses money to the blocking people out of market? Steam & Some legit users
What wild accusations? Honnestly, steams words and claims. I am just replying to them.
When you are talking about high value items who can have price fluctuations daily. Yes, yes I am. If I was a stock broken and they tried to pull this on the stock market. I would have a mental breakdown and probably throw myself off a bridge.
Sure it isen't that bad in most cases. But most people feel pretty horrible after losing the opportunity to make some easy case. And steam gets a cut anyways.
And it does phsyically maim people. Just the other day I got so stressed trying to sell a stupid 14 cent box that I fisted the wall. Out of stress. With these new measures. And had to go calm down and simply realise its not possible for me at the moment to sell stuff.
It would be apreciated if those who do manage to stomach my bad writing to atleast give some suggestions or alternatives. I mean you bothered to read it. Might aswell waste some more minutes actually thinking about helping with the comeupance of ideas. Rather than the nitpicking at exact words.
I am not trying to insinuate that I speak for all. Or that I have the sollution.
I am asking everyone. To help sort our community out. And find a way people don't need to get rolled over because some malicious individuals steal things.
I will try to change wordings here and there to clarify my intent better however my raging autism and dyslexic horde of typo's certainly don't help me get my point across.
phishing, as long as people are guillible will happen. No matter how many guidelines you make, no matter how many guides is published about this, no matter how much we scream at people not to fall for such because it will still happen.
only solution to radically stop these issues would be to remove the market and skins being tradable completely, basically cutting any incentive for scammers. But at this point its safe to say that its not an option.
I would agree. There is too much invested now to just remove the market & trade.
And gulible people will be gullible.
Thats why I suggested different strategies that don't lock people out. But instead slow down the trade for people unwilling or unable to be more secure.
Aswell as a strategy plan that would make the damage more controllable for steam.
My problem is their current strategy is forcing some players not to be able to participate.
While the focus should be to slow things down to a standard that makes it easier for them to recover the stolen goods.
This is how all security systems should work. At risk users will have be forced to turn on maximum security to use the system while other users can use the system with 0 inconveniences attached.
I agree. It would be a way to allow normal usage to continue and those who can't take care cautiously of their account to be "protected for their own good" in a more acceptable way.
Accept.... now you have created a "Haves and Have Nots" scenario. And all of those people who do have to have the max security are now madnat steam and all of those who dont have any security. And a ton more people complaining.
The fact of the matter is: The average Steam user is an IDIOT!
They can't even manage to use a search function before posting a new thread about something that has been discussed a thousand times over.
Before any of steam's security measures it went a little something like "Hey want a free knife? All i need is your log in info and ill trade it over." "OKAY!!!!!!1" and five minutes later "Steam support, how can i help you?" "My account got hijacked and all my items are gone!Give me back my items plz!plz!plz!"
So a 2 step is added now you have the same idiots giving out their login and email login and now they have 2 compromised accounts and they are still complaining about how they lost their inventories and that steam's security suxxorz...
This is the best option. If someone tries to log into your account, your phone spits out a code. If its not you, you can change your password. Done. If you dont have a smart phone and somone logs into your account, you have a grace period to get your account back and cancel all those trades you didn't authorize. Your stuff is safe! How on earth is that punishing you for being poor?
FYI You can buy basic smartphone without service for super cheap and leave it next to your computer on wifi and have an authenticator....
Yeah. I agree that it may make people mad. But you could have it slowly lower over time.
Not be a permanent thing.
Honnestly I think anyone who realy lost items to this should really be forced to use the authenticator. But I don't think I should suffer 15 day trade holds, let alone I can't even authenticate any sales anymore at all because of this.
So I am supposed to buy a phone I don't want.
Just to use a regular steam function?
I do not want a mobile phone. The idea of phones is something I dispise.
I don't need them. Nor want them. The idea of spending any amount of money to buy a physical tool to allow me to do something simple.
Thats just too far.
And yes, I am that cheap. Or that poor.
We are talking a person so cheap. They will randomly awarded stuff to avoid spending money to buy a 1 pound game.
But hackers aren't stupid and they sure can read the news. So they will know the escrow is getting lower over time. They will just wait 14 weeks and boom. New wave of hijacking. And everyone will lose their items in a day, because hey they have no escrow just like they've asked. Well, of course not everyone, but probably a huge amount of users. And escrow becomes useless.
Do you think it's the same 77,000 guys getting compromised every month over and over again? Don't you think some of these people (and we don't know how many of them) are new and have never lost their items before? Don't you think some of them just like you thought that they are smart enough to not lose their account?
You have money to buy so many games though.