Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
https://store.steampowered.com/app/250900/The_Binding_of_Isaac_Rebirth/
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1145360/Hades/
https://store.steampowered.com/app/219150/Hotline_Miami/
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1245620/ELDEN_RING/
https://store.steampowered.com/app/892970/Valheim/
almost 27000 positive reviews for Elden Ring since Nov 22nd, and before that it was a couple hundred a day
Adding to that, to get the full Sales badge, you have to review a nominated game you've played this year. That's up the review count for nearly every popular game that came out this year and anything that counts towards the "Labour of Love" category.
Low-quality positive reviews like - thumbs up or pure nonsense - Support takes down as a rule, which accounts for the uptick in the number of takedowns.
The simplest answer is almost always the best.
In the review spikes, which went from around 100 reviews per day to over 7500 over a four day period (Little below 7700 over the last 30 days, which doesn't add up, 94% positive which I think I saw at 97-98% at the start). Overall score now slightly above 80% from a bit over 100k reviews.
Clicking on one of the spikes, you'll see some ordinary reviews, but mostly these spanish, one sentence reviews all added at the 3 hour mark. The profiles I see on this page have plenty of products on their accounts, but either one or two reviews. They're all level 9 steam accounts. Same situation the next day spike, but some accounts are level 7 here. Similar avatar selection, except the first day spike where none of these similar reviews had any avatars.
The total amount of reviews went first down ca 2000 reviews, up 1300 and latest down 500 again, from the highest point that I saw, at start.
I could be missing something, but it just looks a bit odd to me. I've reported the product to Valve for further investigation and I really have nothing else to add here now. I've no reason to persuade any of you that there may be fake reviews out there.
Most every bot ever is easy to spot as a bot.
That being said, if you can communicate with the person who made the review, they're not a bot.
Since no bot has passed the Turing Test.
It's a bit excessive to think every good review is a bot.
In fact, it seems a bit way over the top.
And this happened during a period where there was a sales event wherein one of the tasks for a badge was to write a review for a nominated game....and you don't see how that might cause a spike. Of course assuming there was a spike as you describe.
That's not usnusual. Most people who buy and play a game don't write reviews.
Butthe sort of account you describe isn't what one would expect of a bot. Niow quick query though. Were this games market as steam purchases or key activations?
If you can't tell a fake from a genuine. or point to one as an example. Can you really say there are fake reviews. I mean meme reviews are a thing and so are shill reviews, but can you really say the entiment is not that of the operson writing it? That's one of the few ways a review can be 'fake'. ANother is when it speaks of things that are not part of the game.
It's actually the opposite, Valve will only catch them after users report the devs/pubs for doing that. That applies to all situations, even games that use your PC to mine crypto...
There are a few reasons to not name the company. One is that it would be used as a major reason for why the reviews aren't fake/bot/manipulated - I'd have something against the company which would be the reason I try to frame them for something. You understand that this is true?! Now I've not outed the publisher/dev, but can PM someone who is beyond sceptical about my suspicions. I think it's a fair and pretty interesting take on the issue.
Please do so, I'm curious.
So you'd rather just try to frame the review system itself?
So basically you have noproblem with framing the company, just not in a forum or format where your statement becomes a matter of public, objective record, and not some he said/she said thing you can wiggle out from?
It has happened, you just don't know about it. How about you do some research before saying things?
Anyway, dear loppantorkel, devs manipulating reviews is nothing new and Valve will take action if they find evidence of that after being alerted. Feel free to send me a link through Steam chat, so I can see what game you suspect is doing that.
So if you know of another one. Please feel free to cite it.
Oh, perhaps you don't have access to a search engine atm, sorry for not considering that possibility. The game I was referring to is called Abstractism.
Anyway, various games have been banned from Steam for manipulating reviews, but only after they were reported for doing that. Therefore, if the game in question is really doing that, I guess the op can rest assured Steam will take action.
Agreed though the game may remain up. If there's no actual evidence of the dev/pubs involvement there's no action Valve can take against them but to ban the offending accounts from reviewing. Assuming the IOP's claims are in anyway true of course.