Steam needs some quality control

[Pierce Dalton]

I've seen some awful games here but this one takes the cake for now:

https://store.steampowered.com/app/2084220/Invisible_Man_VR_In_Eleanors_room/


Seriously, what store would approve a game focused on raping? What the hell?

It looks like games are approved by an automated system that only scans for malware, nothing else. No virus? Good to go.

I can't help but wonder if GabeN would want stuff like this on Steam. I hope not.

How do I report this game to Valve?!

[davidb11]

You do know that Rapelay was banned from ever being allowed on Steam. Right?
Don't bring it up.
IT's also a troll game

Please don't blindly lie about it being on Steam.
Sheesh.

That being said, while the OP's game is awkward, again, it's not even that bad compared to a lot of other games on Steam.
So, no one can complain only about it.


There are several games on Steam that feature rape.
No one can be taken seriously if they're not going to crusade against EVERY game.

Also, it is literally not against the law to make a game about it.

[Pierce Dalton]

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

You do know that Rapelay was banned from ever being allowed on Steam. Right?
Don't bring it up.
IT's also a troll game

Please don't blindly lie about it being on Steam.
Sheesh.

That being said, while the OP's game is awkward, again, it's not even that bad compared to a lot of other games on Steam.
So, no one can complain only about it.


There are several games on Steam that feature rape.
No one can be taken seriously if they're not going to crusade against EVERY game.

Also, it is literally not against the law to make a game about it.

Of course I know, I did not say the game is on Steam.

By the way, you're confusing Rape Day with RapeLay, the latter never made it to Steam.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

2. Most videogames are about killing, that's the norm. Even Fortnite, played by thousands of children around the world. Say they kill an unarmed player (keep in mind you start unarmed), aren't they killing innocent, harmless people too? Look, if you feel bothered by games that let you kill innocent people, you can always make a thread about that, because this doesn't fit the topic here. Whether you like it or not, games about killing people (innocent or not) are normal, games about raping people are not. There are limits for everything.

So, one thing is OK because it's the norm? You've literally argued against that exact logic.

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

https://freespeechdebate.com/case/rapelay-a-virtual-rape-game/

In 2006, the Japanese company Illusion Soft released the video game RapeLay. The objective of the game is to repeatedly rape a mother and her two young daughters, and force them to have an abortion if they become pregnant. While the game was only released domestically, it quickly spread worldwide through the internet.

You think it's ok to have repulsive sit like this on Steam?
Well, if you do, I can only feel sorry for you. You need help.

Why did you bring up a game that is literally nothing like the one you're upset about and has been banned outside Japan for the most part?

Also, as pointed out earlier, you literally have playtime in a game with rape. Breeders of the Nephalym literally has a rape option.

[K13Cove]

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

1. Narrow your search to cheap games and you might notice it takes a while to find something passable, because you're going through a sea of shovelware. That's how it affects other games (which are not necessarily good, but say decent).

Literally any search for any genre will take a while to find something passable. People select games on an exclusionary basis; they don't buy most of the games that show up in their search results, just the isolated few they're interested in. Dismissing games you haven't played as "shovelware" isn't an actual reflection of their quality. I think arbitrarily removing games from the store based on nothing more than being offended by the themes in them will be more harmful to the store than one more game that shows up under select search results.

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

Most videogames are about killing, that's the norm. Even Fortnite, played by thousands of children around the world. Say they kill an unarmed player (keep in mind you start unarmed), aren't they killing innocent, harmless people too? Look, if you feel bothered by games that let you kill innocent people, you can always make a thread about that, because this doesn't fit the topic here. Whether you like it or not, games about killing people (innocent or not) are normal, games about raping people are not. There are limits for everything.

Appeals to normalcy are fallacious. Some countries, regions and other select groups consider immoral acts "normal" in a vacuum. Killing innocent people is wrong, raping innocent people is wrong; there is no normalisation of such acts that will change that. Additionally, killing people is much worse than raping people, so if anything that shows that you aren't operating under what is considered a moral threshold of acceptability.
Unless you're prepared to extend your (dubious) outrage to every game that contains immoral acts, then the complaint holds no ground.

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

In 2006, the Japanese company Illusion Soft released the video game RapeLay. The objective of the game is to repeatedly rape a mother and her two young daughters, and force them to have an abortion if they become pregnant. While the game was only released domestically, it quickly spread worldwide through the internet.

You think it's ok to have repulsive sit like this on Steam?
Well, if you do, I can only feel sorry for you. You need help.

Yes, it's fictional. The pixels are not sentient and won't be worse off for any amount of "repulsive" games people play.

[Pierce Dalton]

KittenGrindr님이 먼저 게시:

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

2. Most videogames are about killing, that's the norm. Even Fortnite, played by thousands of children around the world. Say they kill an unarmed player (keep in mind you start unarmed), aren't they killing innocent, harmless people too? Look, if you feel bothered by games that let you kill innocent people, you can always make a thread about that, because this doesn't fit the topic here. Whether you like it or not, games about killing people (innocent or not) are normal, games about raping people are not. There are limits for everything.

So, one thing is OK because it's the norm? You've literally argued against that exact logic.

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

https://freespeechdebate.com/case/rapelay-a-virtual-rape-game/

In 2006, the Japanese company Illusion Soft released the video game RapeLay. The objective of the game is to repeatedly rape a mother and her two young daughters, and force them to have an abortion if they become pregnant. While the game was only released domestically, it quickly spread worldwide through the internet.

You think it's ok to have repulsive sit like this on Steam?
Well, if you do, I can only feel sorry for you. You need help.

Why did you bring up a game that is literally nothing like the one you're upset about and has been banned outside Japan for the most part?

Oh, Kit... once again you fail to comprehend the most basic things, I'm getting used to it at this point.

So one game is literally nothing like the other? Weren't you able to notice both are about raping people?

[Boblin the Goblin]

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

KittenGrindr님이 먼저 게시:

So, one thing is OK because it's the norm? You've literally argued against that exact logic.



Why did you bring up a game that is literally nothing like the one you're upset about and has been banned outside Japan for the most part?

Oh, Kit... once again you fail to comprehend the most basic things, I'm getting used to it at this point.

So one game is literally nothing like the other? Weren't you able to notice both are about raping people?

One has that as an option(Like another game you literally have playtime in). The other literally has you do that to progress the game among further extreme things.

[Pierce Dalton]

C10 Revamp님이 먼저 게시:

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

1. Narrow your search to cheap games and you might notice it takes a while to find something passable, because you're going through a sea of shovelware. That's how it affects other games (which are not necessarily good, but say decent).

Literally any search for any genre will take a while to find something passable. People select games on an exclusionary basis; they don't buy most of the games that show up in their search results, just the isolated few they're interested in. Dismissing games you haven't played as "shovelware" isn't an actual reflection of their quality. I think arbitrarily removing games from the store based on nothing more than being offended by the themes in them will be more harmful to the store than one more game that shows up under select search results.

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

Most videogames are about killing, that's the norm. Even Fortnite, played by thousands of children around the world. Say they kill an unarmed player (keep in mind you start unarmed), aren't they killing innocent, harmless people too? Look, if you feel bothered by games that let you kill innocent people, you can always make a thread about that, because this doesn't fit the topic here. Whether you like it or not, games about killing people (innocent or not) are normal, games about raping people are not. There are limits for everything.

Appeals to normalcy are fallacious. Some countries, regions and other select groups consider immoral acts "normal" in a vacuum. Killing innocent people is wrong, raping innocent people is wrong; there is no normalisation of such acts that will change that. Additionally, killing people is much worse than raping people, so if anything that shows that you aren't operating under what is considered a moral threshold of acceptability.
Unless you're prepared to extend your (dubious) outrage to every game that contains immoral acts, then the complaint holds no ground.

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

In 2006, the Japanese company Illusion Soft released the video game RapeLay. The objective of the game is to repeatedly rape a mother and her two young daughters, and force them to have an abortion if they become pregnant. While the game was only released domestically, it quickly spread worldwide through the internet.

You think it's ok to have repulsive sit like this on Steam?
Well, if you do, I can only feel sorry for you. You need help.

Yes, it's fictional. The pixels are not sentient and won't be worse off for any amount of "repulsive" games people play.

Who claimed pixels are sentient?

Such fallacy says a lot about you, thank you.

[Pierce Dalton]

KittenGrindr님이 먼저 게시:

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

Oh, Kit... once again you fail to comprehend the most basic things, I'm getting used to it at this point.

So one game is literally nothing like the other? Weren't you able to notice both are about raping people?

One has that as an option(Like another game you literally have playtime in). The other literally has you do that to progress the game among further extreme things.

Yeah? What game are you talking about?

[Boblin the Goblin]

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

KittenGrindr님이 먼저 게시:

One has that as an option(Like another game you literally have playtime in). The other literally has you do that to progress the game among further extreme things.

Yeah? What game are you talking about?

Breeders of the Nephalym. As already discussed, it has a rape option. You have playtime in it or it wouldn't be in your library.

So you've shown you are actually OK with games containing rape on that alone.

[K13Cove]

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

C10 Revamp님이 먼저 게시:

Literally any search for any genre will take a while to find something passable. People select games on an exclusionary basis; they don't buy most of the games that show up in their search results, just the isolated few they're interested in. Dismissing games you haven't played as "shovelware" isn't an actual reflection of their quality. I think arbitrarily removing games from the store based on nothing more than being offended by the themes in them will be more harmful to the store than one more game that shows up under select search results.

Appeals to normalcy are fallacious. Some countries, regions and other select groups consider immoral acts "normal" in a vacuum. Killing innocent people is wrong, raping innocent people is wrong; there is no normalisation of such acts that will change that. Additionally, killing people is much worse than raping people, so if anything that shows that you aren't operating under what is considered a moral threshold of acceptability.
Unless you're prepared to extend your (dubious) outrage to every game that contains immoral acts, then the complaint holds no ground.

Yes, it's fictional. The pixels are not sentient and won't be worse off for any amount of "repulsive" games people play.

Who claimed pixels are sentient?

Such fallacy says a lot about you, thank you.

No one needs to claim it. Barring these pixelated characters each gaining their own little specks of humanity and awareness, there's no excuse for trying to remove the games they're in.

[Pierce Dalton]

KittenGrindr님이 먼저 게시:

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

Yeah? What game are you talking about?

Breeders of the Nephalym. As already discussed, it has a rape option. You have playtime in it or it wouldn't be in your library.

So you've shown you are actually OK with games containing rape on that alone.

Thanks for demonstrating that you're perfectly fine with lying, Kit. I already knew that, but confirmation is always welcome. Here is the proof you're lying:

https://ibb.co/F6g1bDr

As you can see if you scroll through my game list, I have playtime in other adult games, because I've never cared about hiding that I play adult games. So how do you explain there's no playtime for Breeders?

Anyone knows that people can add free games to their library and play them later, or never play them (that's not unusual). I haven't played that game yet, but I remember that a user named fluxtorrent mentioned it in another thread and I replied with this:
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/0/3377158861989164975/?ctp=2#c3476238687973303398

Besides, you do realize there is a huge difference between your character getting raped and your character raping others, right?

[Pierce Dalton]

C10 Revamp님이 먼저 게시:

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

Who claimed pixels are sentient?

Such fallacy says a lot about you, thank you.

No one needs to claim it. Barring these pixelated characters each gaining their own little specks of humanity and awareness, there's no excuse for trying to remove the games they're in.

So you're also ok with a game where the player violates babies, because they're just pixels?
Like I said, people like you need help.

[K13Cove]

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

C10 Revamp님이 먼저 게시:

No one needs to claim it. Barring these pixelated characters each gaining their own little specks of humanity and awareness, there's no excuse for trying to remove the games they're in.

So you're also ok with a game where the player violates babies, because they're just pixels?
Like I said, people like you need help.

Yes, it's fictional. I doubt Steam would be, but that isn't even what you're trying to remove, is it? You want a game with rape removed under strangely specific criteria, while making exceptions for everything you actually play. It seems like an instance of wanting Steam to cater exclusively to your own tastes, and either ignore or scorn the tastes of anyone else.

[Pierce Dalton]

C10 Revamp님이 먼저 게시:

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

So you're also ok with a game where the player violates babies, because they're just pixels?
Like I said, people like you need help.

Yes, it's fictional. I doubt Steam would be, but that isn't even what you're trying to remove, is it? You want a game with rape removed under strangely specific criteria, while making exceptions for everything you actually play. It seems like an instance of wanting Steam to cater exclusively to your own tastes, and either ignore or scorn the tastes of anyone else.

Everything I actually play? Like?

[Boblin the Goblin]

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

KittenGrindr님이 먼저 게시:

Breeders of the Nephalym. As already discussed, it has a rape option. You have playtime in it or it wouldn't be in your library.

So you've shown you are actually OK with games containing rape on that alone.

Thanks for demonstrating that you're perfectly fine with lying, Kit. I already knew that, but confirmation is always welcome. Here is the proof you're lying:

https://ibb.co/F6g1bDr

As you can see if you scroll through my game list, I have playtime in other adult games, because I've never cared about hiding that I play adult games. So how do you explain there's no playtime for Breeders?

Anyone knows that people can add free games to their library and play them later, or never play them (that's not unusual). I haven't played that game yet, but I remember that a user named fluxtorrent mentioned it in another thread and I replied with this:
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/0/3377158861989164975/?ctp=2#c3476238687973303398

Besides, you do realize there is a huge difference between your character getting raped and your character raping others, right?

Nephalym is raping others.