Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
No. Many game devs say their games aren't political or saying anything of expression. Many many companies that make games try to say they do not make a stand at all. On anything. They never want to alienate one customer base.
Valve is especially noteworthy for not taking stances on ANYTHING UNLESS enough PUBLIC pressure, otherwise its ignored.
Just like The Division 2 isn't political. Or Call of Duty isn't political: its just a visit to a country. Or Spec Ops The Line isn't related to conflict.
What you're referring to is if games try to give propaganda or not. I don't think it happens. You can't really ban politics in games because it's sometimes part of the whole system of the story, you CAN ban propaganda made to manipulate players, however. Little difference.
I can have a civil conversation and note you have inflamatory and insulting comments in your post history which some pokes some holes in your argumentation.
Reminds me of all the times at the old VAC forums, where the same user claiming he had been 'banned for nothing' also had posts on cheating websites under the same username complaining he had been caught by VAC and warning others to stop using the cheat.
May want to note that's sarcasm, because someone will take it at face value.
Yes, its quite scary how people cannot take an iota of sarcasm.
Then who decides when enough politics is enough? We already get debates when people don't like their particular brand of politics/viewpoints (whatever the hell they may be), in some media or isn't.
People are exceptionally weird like that these days. It defies any logic: Almost as if they are acting on emotions only. Surely some people can see it as "hey, thats the creators perspective, thats okay to agree/disagree" and move on. It seems these days thats exceptionally now not the case, to the point people get offended, even.
Kinda need to know a person before you can make a solid guess, it's steam after all so assuming a well thought out argument is a stretch :)