Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
"Sexual Content" is an official category from the Steam platform.
Wait, you want to talk to your friends *while* you masturbate?
Now seriously, yes, it encourages you to use a second account. Because that means more users in their statistics. If that was planned, we will never know.
So my understanding of this is a small percentage of 20 million users (lets say, what... one million users? 500,000 users even?) will really enjoy an easy to implement feature that has no negative impact on other users and if anything, enhances other users experiences by having less full-private profiles around on Steam which are boring/anti-social to have.
I'm just struggling to see where the opposition to this is coming from. People are really against this for no reason at all. It reminds me of a time when I made a suggestion for a game to implement (it was mass deconscripting troops or something) and people were SO angrily against it just because... well, just because. It eventually got put into the game and a few months later everyone enjoyed it, even the original haters had no complaints later in time.
TL;DR - This has only benefits, no negatives on anyone, and people still don't want it for some reason.
Remember Developers are as much Steam customers as we are.
Explaining something doesn't imply agreement. As I said earlier:
Only if you're accounting for Steam users. Steam has to cater two kind of customers in their service:
-The users who buy games
-The developers who sell them.
It's a difficult balance.
You deem others as opposition because they have an opinion in direct conflict with your own.
Are their opinions therefore worthless? No they are not simply because they are pointing out "alternatives" based on two factors - Valve Time and if Valve see no value in it they will not implement it irrespective of whether you see it as only having benefits and no negatives.
Welcome to the Steam Suggestions / Ideas forum. This is just part of the culture that the mods have cultivated here. Don't take it personally. Every new OP has the exact same experience with the exact same group of people.
Some friends keep asking to join their game that you both own but it is possible that you lost old motivation to play that game after a while. Hence, it can work nicely to circumvent those possible not-ideal situations by just hiding them when you lose all interest in some games.
Definitely yes, I understand. I would never deny someone their privacy.
I completely agree. Also, c'mon, everyone knows men watch porn lol. Sure, not all of them, but like 95%. You're not commiting a crime, there's nothing to be ashamed of.
Can confirm.
Oh, that's interesting. What is the hardest one you've found?
Usually they're not even "games", so a good challenge is welcome.