Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Microsoft tried it on their own store, now guess why they removed it.
Use the search feature.
I know that La-Mulana came with a "La-Mulana checker" which you could run and it'd tell you whether the game's likely to run properly. It's a very lightweight game relative to modern computers, so the tool isn't really necessary (I'm not sure it was even back when it was released), but it does show the possibility of having devs include a little checker tool.
And this one in particular basically gave you a result like "just fine", "it might be okay", or "might be a problem!" -- even it didn't guarantee a result, technically speaking.
If you multiply it by every steam user and every game they started you could have a nice catalog that would allow to predict if game will run on specific setups or what expected framerate could be.
It's not going to happen, people need to read the Min & Rec specs.
you do know that Steam can already display an FPS counter ingame,right?