安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
该主题的作者已标记一个回帖作为问题的解答。
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
No it doesn't, which I why I think we now need to address the larger problem in the room.
"This is a private group." "Request to join."
I do not now nor will I ever give consent for large corporation to go dumpster diving through my personal data. I am not interesting in "marketing campaigns", "user optics", or whatever trendy buzzwords they use to replace "stalking".
And I think they know this or they wouldn't have quietly slipped this option in, with only a single mentioned on a hidden group. Because given the choice most people do not want to be spied on.
They want to know what I like and dislike? Send me a survey. Don't keep tabs on my browsing history, that's creepy.
Off, all of it, by default. Give the users the option to op-in.
It's exactly this kind of stuff is why I lost all confidence in Valve.
edit:
So you know that "this comment is awaiting analysis"?
https://imgur.com/9lTh2UT
I had to change the wording on this post 3 times before it let me post it.
I am not amused by this AI trick. >:|
But yes, isn't something that can be do without explicit consent. This kind of marketing based on tracking people navigation and habit has already went too far.
And the worst is behind the corner. Google's FLOC in chromium is really dangerous, we should publicy ask Valve is they are going (or already have) to enable FLOC inside Steam.
With everything that's happened in the last 2 years Valve's word doesn't really mean much anymore.
The fact that it considers criticism and spam the same thing is troubling in itself. It's only "minor" when you're not looking in the right places. When, for example, Dead Or Alive 6 decided to start selling $2000 worth of DLC a lot of angry customers were suddenly classified as "spammers". And the list of infractions goes on with every game controversy.
These analytics need to stop, especially without the user's consent. And this big brother machine oversight needs to stop. At best it will confused legitimate criticism as spam. At worst it can be exploited to silence criticism altogether.
https://imgur.com/pDah1xJ
And honestly the fact that this is vague is concerning.
Removing "off topic" (or as normal people call them, "negative") reviews, removing and hiding criticism of Valve and new Steam bugs- I mean features, tracking users and a small array of more off-topic things.
Yes, I must be insane, there's no way a dominant market share corporation would do things like that to protect their bottom line.
In any case this isn't the subject of the topic here.
[audience going "oooh!"]
Next up is someone going "you have a persecution fetish" and then the thread gets locked because apparently thats easier (read: more fun) than taking care of trolls.
Anyways, to add an opt-out privacy violation slider and after people notice it, removing it and exchanging it for another opt-out privacy violation slider is just the latest in a now about 2 year long crusade of valve to commit to what appears to be their new motto.
Customers can go [bannable word] themselves.
That, and what appears to be the moderation teams new hobby of raising trolls like sea monkeys.
Sprinkle a few 3 day bans here, where they are called out, lock a thread they derailed there...
Im gonna take my inevidable false ban and go check if the privacy violation slider unchecked itself yet.
Honestly, being in some kinda weird bizarro world where people make bad decisions for the sake of it is the only logical explanation left.
+1 to default off.
Section 7 of https://marketingplatform.google.com/about/analytics/terms/us/ describes the required disclosures and was required since before GDPR.