Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Agreed completely
The userbase of Steam grew over 20% in the last year. Epic Game store about 5%. Additionally, all accounts spend an average of just 3 US Dollars in the Epic Games store, for the whole year.
So, most accounts just collected the free games and never bought anything.
Epic Games store is bleeding money, a lot of it.
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/10/3118150513194573207/
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/10/3118150513195382615/
They might or might not bring it back in the future. Perhaps in Valve time.
A lot of other companies don't have a rewards program. Valve is one of those companies. And arguably Valve is doing pretty well without it. They had an option to implement a points system that could be used as store credit. And they chose not to. You might ask yourself what those reasons might be.
How does it encourage community? And if a rewards program had such strong benefits as you're peddling you have to ask yourself does Valve live in a cave? Can't they do math? Or are there other aspects you're not considering and it's not all win-win.
And I'm sure they learned a lot doing it. And maybe that informed their decision about the implementation of points not having value. Or do you think Valve is just prone to turn their noses up to a great idea that,"encourages community and more purchasing through Steam?" What if the actual reality was different than what you're telling yourself?
Well you can twist it around however you want. You're asking Valve to subsidize your purchases so you'll purchase more stuff?
At 1000 points per dollar. Every $50 game would effectively be $45. And Valve would lose 33% of their split at 30%, 40% of their split at 25%, and about 50% at 20%. That's a pretty big pay cut and whatever you imagine the benefits of your idea, it's probably not going to increase revenues by an even greater amount to offset that.
So you might want to add a couple of zeros to the points per dollar conversion.
ya I don't think so seeing as how some of the stuff that are up for like 2000 points are like 3 cents on the market. That means a 5 dollar off coupon would need to be around 333,333 points. So 5000 points would get you about 7 and a half cents off.
Except points aren't gained exclusively through purchasing so no.
Once again since you decided to necro this, steam points aren't exclusively acquired from spending money so "JuSt LeT mE hAvE fReE mOnEy" isn't going to fly.
look at every forum post writing inflammatory posts to bait people into awarding jesters.
that money would also have to come from somewhere. steam points are essentially worthless, if they had an actual value you would need to bank them right. that's a burden on valve.