安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
But you would get the message in your notifications that the content was "moved or deleted" anyways. So, you can assume by that what you will.
The auto notification system could use some work. I agree with your sentiment in general. I just don't think it worth their time to update the code to do it. Its only a problem if for some reason they think it broke the rules... or if as you claim there is a rogue moderator at large. If there is one they will be found out and dealt with as they have been before.
It only notifies the reporter, not the reported.
Normally when some of your content forces the moderator to act you will get a notification too. Either a warning or even worse a ban notification.
I know that this does not necessarily happen as I once had a 12 hours ban which I only found out because I checked my E-Mails a day after. But yeah in general you'll get notified about a moderator acting because of some of your conent
That is IF action that was taken warranted a moderation message for a warning/ban and not from reported content someone else reported that was acted upon.
Refusing to waste time on malcontents isn't unethical.
A moderator can however 100% delete a thread of yours without warning if they choose to.
This is probably done for spam reasons, though even then I think it unethical to not notify the user of the name and url of the thread deleted, along with a reason.
Shadow-deletion of an entire discussion is not ethical and needs to be 100% documented and provided as a notification to the receiving user. I don't care if this is the norm or not for Steam, this is a standard that should be upheld for any forum to ensure there is some degree of understanding and accountability where necessary.
Again, this only happened 1 time, but this really should never happen as there is no good reason to not provide the user notification so they know it happened, documentation so they can go to support for questions and concerns, and rule/guideline citation so understanding of what was wrong or perhaps what was misunderstood can be corrected.
I believe this ties into some universal standards for user rights we as users and respectively the moderators should give reasonable ethical considerations for.
You just want a reason for every one of your threads and posts that are deleted so you can argue it, which you are not entitled to.
Posters on a discussion should also be notified if a thread is “shadow-deleted” by either the OP or a moderator, so there would be understanding why a user’s post no longer shows in their post history and a recent discussion no longer shows on the forums.
Actually it would be a bad idea if players were notified if the OP deleted the thread before it reached max # of posts that prevent thread deletion.
For some of the more argumentative ones where the OP posts something so illogical that they get offended by a couple replies, having the other posters notified that the OP deleted the thread after they posted, that could be used to harass the OP.
Example:
“boo hoo, I upset you so much you deleted your post. Why do you bother posting anything?”
Would just let to more moderation in getting troll posts acted upon.