安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
此主题已被锁定 
该主题的作者已标记一个回帖作为问题的解答。
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
When you learn what irony is. Then you can speak of people not seeing it.
Well there are idiots who complain about the steam client not functioning on unsupported OSes so...
You're confusing this with automatic downloads. We're not concerned with this even for XP where most games are as is.
LOL the irony is there. You're oblivious to see it.
That isn't the argument here. That was VALVE distributing the client for an unsupported OS. Completely different for someone explicitly downloading them.
The question was:
Your answer:
COnclusion. You really have no clue as to what you're saying.
Keep telling yourself that. But for the love of god invest in a dictionary.
[/quote]
Already proven you wrong on that point. Keep trying.
Yet you keep trolling. You don't know what this is about clearly, that's why you cant see the irony. That has nothing to do with a dictionary or whatever twisted definition you have for it, but it was clearly irony. Please, do stop with arguing semantics and getting off topic.
No, you have not because you don't friggin' get it! You're full of crap right now and this isn't even what this topic is about.
So your options are, upgrade,/use your windows 7 box, migrate to another service/platform or just do without. Take your pick and move on with your life.
And nobody here wants to run the client on an unsupported system, and we wanted to keep Valve from doing so on systems they aren't supposed to extend support to, especially when it runs counter to their obligations in the SSA. The update was never needed for it. This is not the fault of the user, it's Valve's system overriding the desire to have a functioning client. It does not matter whether there is connectivity at this point, and does not require online use. Just a simple functioning client to launch games. This is not a difficult concept.
That update that bricked the client, bricked up any possible use for being a simple launcher which was not necessary in the first place. This makes use of Steam DRM games much harder to use, and a problem to be avoided with just a functioning client. No internet use is required to do this, and in practice, I currently have a working client doing just that. So seriously, you're doing nothing but arguing and ticking me off.
And again, Win 7+ is pretty damned irrelevant. We don't need to upgrade here in the current circumstances. The XP client functions just fine. All your arguing is going around in circles with the overuse of argumentum ad novitatem, which does nothing for the sake of the fact that XP still is and can be used. There's no need to reinvent the wheel. The whole point was that Valve should have refrained from overwriting the client for the sake of something else. But once again, you're gonna skirt the issue and start blaming people. You should kindly just leave.
And stop with the Win 7+ crap. It's not productive.
That same version is updated across all the other OS's...
If you get an update on Windows XP, everyone that includes vista, 7, 8, 8.1, and 10, will be getting that update, the same vice versa...
The XP client functions in it's requisite capacity according to it's lack of support. Just for being a simple launcher is enough and all that is needed. Not an update to do the opposite by disabling the whole thing. Argumentum ad novitatem arguments are tiresome and superfluous, since it isn't at all like XP doesn't work. It's just simply just that the supported client (not the Win 7+ one) will do. You don't need to upgrade to perform a basic function. Bricking it is unnecessary.
Forget it. He's too far gone.
No matter how many times it is explained to him he will insist that the way he thinks it should work is how it works. He can't seperate his preconceptions, from reality. SO let us leave him to his parallel world.
We have only one version on Windows... You're talking about the firmware / update version, I'm talking about how there's only one single client itself, that was made for across all versions of Windows... Hence the one version, as there's no stand alone XP version, Vista version, and etc.. It's all put into one client, which we all get, and get the same update.... Even if the fix has nothing to do with the other versions of Windows, the code still getting applied to their client as it's a single one version client, which we all get the same updates.
It literally becomes a separate client when you have a newer incarnation of a client, especially when the newer version does not support OSs like XP. This is the definition and the concept of what a legacy client is about. It doesn't get the codes for the new client, which is what I've been telling you the entire time! It's not one version anymore.
I do the same thing with UPlay. Yes, there's still a UPlay client for XP! It's different from the newer UPlay client intended for later versions of Windows, and they run on different systems.