Εγκατάσταση Steam
Σύνδεση
|
Γλώσσα
简体中文 (Απλοποιημένα κινεζικά)
繁體中文 (Παραδοσιακά κινεζικά)
日本語 (Ιαπωνικά)
한국어 (Κορεατικά)
ไทย (Ταϊλανδικά)
Български (Βουλγαρικά)
Čeština (Τσεχικά)
Dansk (Δανικά)
Deutsch (Γερμανικά)
English (Αγγλικά)
Español – España (Ισπανικά – Ισπανία)
Español – Latinoamérica (Ισπανικά – Λατινική Αμερική)
Français (Γαλλικά)
Italiano (Ιταλικά)
Bahasa Indonesia (Ινδονησιακά)
Magyar (Ουγγρικά)
Nederlands (Ολλανδικά)
Norsk (Νορβηγικά)
Polski (Πολωνικά)
Português (Πορτογαλικά – Πορτογαλία)
Português – Brasil (Πορτογαλικά – Βραζιλία)
Română (Ρουμανικά)
Русский (Ρωσικά)
Suomi (Φινλανδικά)
Svenska (Σουηδικά)
Türkçe (Τουρκικά)
Tiếng Việt (Βιετναμικά)
Українська (Ουκρανικά)
Αναφορά προβλήματος μετάφρασης
What we've got, are adult visual novels / anime-themed games that cannot be purchased without either PayPal or a credit card, both of which a child should not have unrestricted access to, and the games themselves contain 18+ characters only, unless the content isn't actually sexual. In other words, "lolis" and "porn" do not coincide. If you can prove otherwise, by all means do so.
From all the evidence (or lack thereof) that I've seen, though, the whole "pedo porn" claim seems to be largely a fabrication and wilful misrepresentation perpetrated by MiM to put pressure on PayPal to in turn put pressure on Steam to put pressure on developers, one long relay race of bullcrap being passed from one to the other while MiM sits and giggles in the background. It really isn't the devs', Valve's or fans' problem if you "feel" that an anime character in a game with that art style "looks too young" for you to be "comfortable" and it starts getting "problematic". You may as well say "the characters in Futurama look too young, yet are shown or implied to be having sex, so that's loli porn".
Yeah, you can have an 18-year-old or 20+ or 30+ woman dressed in the loli style, which works easily in anime and could no doubt work IRL too if she's asian (and quite possibly if she's not). And also, naturally, not every woman wants to look like a lolita, even if she happens to look younger than her age. To each their own, yeah?
Most of us who buy trough Steam have info already saved anyway, and it's the best way how to vilidate your age i think. Yes it's still be worked around, but its WAAAY better system then "You are 18+ old? Yes/no" ...
I mean i would love adult games for Steam! Judge me as you wish, but they are already here, won't name them so Steam wont hunt them down, but common! Adult gaming have the same market as normal one, alot of good artist's, developers, and such who do these kind of games benifit alot from EA here, and let alone, they have to be beggars on Patreon, when doing great job, and the games have alot of times more value then 80% of games on Steam. Again can't name them, but there are alot of great adult games which diserve attention for adult audience as well!
Dropped using them when it became clear PayPal got politicized.
Because its the best way to verify your age, i am not happy with that, but this could potentialy work if done right.
The same reason you'd give it to any other online retailer?
I'm going out on a limb and say that most people probably use a credit card in their name already to make the purchase. And if not, that credit card has to be used with permission of the card holder.
Either way, there's your age (or at least permission) verification. Right where it should be. With the parents/guardians, or adults capable of making their own damn decisions.
Yeah that's basicaly solution, and if your kid use the credit card without YOUR PERMISION, it's your fault, not Steam one, so the Steam would be protected, paypal wold be dissabled by default by this, because you cannot confirm the age by this, and this is win =/= win situation for Steam and it's costumers.
Yeah it does, but thats abou you contanting a support, if you have kid in your family, which use same computer as you do, you have family mode on Steam, and if you let him be on Steam with your credit card info in, you are for A) Bad parent and for B) Not carefull with your credit card ... Which is both on the person not on Valve/Steam.
I mean, aside from the "we can dismiss all your purchases at a whim" EULA, anyway.
Even if somebody made a bunch of fradulent transactions on a long-established Steam account, I don't see a valid reason for Steam not to simply remove the reported titles from specific library and leave it at that.
If it's a repeating pattern, then it's another matter altogether.
I think, problem is, that Steam is not always as helpfull or straight-foward in this situation.