Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español - España (Spanska - Spanien)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanska - Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (Portugisiska – Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugisiska - Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (Ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
Do that on Steam and others and myself would do the same. Who takes the 75%-90% loss of income? Unless the Devs themselves want to offer this ability Steam would. Even if they both
split to loss equally neither would be willing to agree to such a loss.
Haven't seen one for ages. Wonder if those 7,500 people that signed over their immortal souls to Gamestop
Actually the second to last store just recently closed within the last year, there is still 1 store open.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/06/business/last-blockbuster-on-the-planet-trnd/index.html
https://globalnews.ca/news/5067378/last-blockbuster-video-store-thriving/
https://www.theverge.com/2018/8/29/17788212/blockbuster-last-video-store-bend-oregon-movie-selection-algorithm-discovery-netflix-hulu-amazon
My bad. Should have been specific and said they closed their last stores in the UK in 2013.
Have to say I'm rather shocked they still have 1 over the pond still going.
You and me both. There was one left in Alaska before this apparently that closed in early 2018 or in 2017.
As for renting games through Steam. I have no interest.
I buy games for 5 or 7 dollars and have a yeas long backlog. I pay less for games by buying them than I ever would through renting. I just dont care if I dont play a game for 2 or 3 years or whatever.
ya its one of those things where you have to check the website 2 or 3 times just to make sure its not the Onion or something. lol
At the OP
As for the topic at hand, game companies have been trying to get rid of game renting in stores for as long as they have been around. Thanks to how the internet is now, they can do that. Download speeds are decent, though it can still take days for some to download games but generally most people have an always on kind of net connection which means the software can connect up and check things so games are not tied to an account for good. No removing it.
The developers/publishers get next to nothing out of renting a game to someone to play it. They get far more from selling it to someone.
The only way they would get something more out by renting is if they charged a lot to rent games. Like 2 or 3 dollars an hour at a minimum. anything that only takes minutes to play, would never be rented cause its cheaper to just buy it. Heck even at these prices it would be cheaper to buy the games.
So again this is not going to happen, because as we already know, they already have subscriptions on steam which is exactly the same thing, which pretty much no one uses.
This is how I see the future of stores like Steam. Games will either be buy once and keep forever. Or they will be free to play with microtransactions to pass for things. And I think more games will move towards the free to play method and be a "live service" as they call them so they can do minimal work with most money coming in.
Hopefully people will wake up and stop buying stuff with microtransactions so that we can get back to better games with more substance and story and less "hey look how flashy I can make my character/weapons while playing against you".
Same here, I have many years long back log too, though some of that is due to needing a major system upgrade cause some of my top games I can't even load on this system.
Interesting not is, that rentals also informed game design for a while. More than a few games ha d mid game puzzles or difficulty spikes that were specifically there to make sure people who rented it would nbever be able to finish the game.
No it doesn't - I don't like or dislike any discussion of ideas all that matters is the truthfulness of it, the relevancy of it, or the possibility of it. Since I already knew about free weekends and so forth it should be obvious that it doesn't much matter to me that the free weekend exists. My idea is about the possibility of adding a renting feature to steam therefore the comment is irrelevant. The only part of the comment that is relevant is that "renting won't ever happen" perhaps this is true, but maybe it isn't true.
It might indeed be possible to make a renting feature for the games the same way that sony, and xbox does it.
So just shutting down the idea doesn't seem very relevant to me. Unless the people who run steam itself say they will never consider it or if it can be shown to me with real data I wouldn't pay it any mind, but some random joe making speculations shutting down an idea doesn't convince me.