Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Or start doing the same thing you suspect others off. It'll either work or you get a personal confirmation Valve does in fact punish people for it. ;)
It has nothing to do with the quality of my work.
The other downvotes that trickle in over time, sure I'll take that. But this is not a matter of discerning artists.
People claiming they think something is happening doesn't mean it is.
Aye, this bring me back to the numerous discussions on game forums about RNG in games, especially Blood Bowl. People love to blame "hardcoded advantages" instead of accepting bad luck.
What people perceive is not always what there is. And if it's a small community then 10 downvotes will have impact, yes. Doesn't mean those downvotes aren't legit or equally counted.
Workshop items with 100+ upvotes tumble down the list and fall behind items with only 20 upvotes when they receive only a few downvotes. Don’t tell me they are equally weighted, I know this happens for fact.
And again, this is not just me. If you did not study the data, then do not reply.
You mean the part where we ask you for actual proof of said claim because you know there's pretty much no proof of what you claim right?
Did you study it? Becuse by definition you don't actually have any 'data'
Anecodtes are not 'data'
You didn't bring anything other than anecdotes, then scream at us for 'not looking at the data' which you don't even have.
You didn't bring anything to the table, yet make a VERY DUBIOUS claim with no evidence or data to support it in any way.
Yet then you wonder why everyone is extremely skeptical of said dubious claim backed with no data or evidence
Then you have the gall to say 'look at the data' that doesnt exist
If you're gonna make the claim, YOU HAVE TO PROVE IT
Anecdotes are not data
Anecdotes are not evidence
You want us to 'study the data' yet you provide no data and nothing of substance. What is there to 'study' if you don't provide said data.
Do you have data? Show it. Its YOUR JOB to convince people of your stance. And yes your claim is utterly dubious, which means you need to bring A LOT of evidence to support your claim. That is ON YOU. We are not here to fall down and take your word for it 'just because'.
It's a public discussion, not your echo chamber. You don't get to decide who can or cannot reply.
You're making accusations, then give some hard proof of those facts. If you can not provide those, you're only making assumptions.
I mean literally at the same time.
I always monitor the start of my mods and mods that are not as popular get no dislikes.
Never thought about an uneven like/dislike ratio, but there is definitely something with the SE workshop.
Mod vs Blueprints rating is not even.
Another popular SE mod creator wrote this on his discord