Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
You cannot display esrb rating without actually passing their classification process.
That's why I prefer IARC.
This way, developer will get rating classification from multiple regions at once.
Maybe adding IARC process as the optional for developer who need rating classification. Doing this process on their own cost a lot of money while IARC is free.
Yeah but to be fair that's because the devs did not expect the players to be able to hack their way into a part of the game that was never meant to be accessed.
OP. Steam does not require any rating. Deves are free to put what ever rating they have up. You cannot aply such things without the explicit consent of the developers.
Devs don't set the rating, they just get the game rated. Getting the game rated is not a legal requirement but it is up to the store whether they will sell games that have not been rated by the ESRB.
That said, most likely their system incurs a licensing fee and may scare away developers who would be forced to comply with their rules, even for non-gaming software.