安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
此主題已被鎖定 
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Doesn't VAC fail to authenticate if you attach a debugger or run it in a VM, though? Anti-reverse engineering is pretty common in security software, where, you know, part of the whole purpose of the software is making it hard to cheat.
And later contrasts that with "maleware" features of battleye.
I suggest that VAC is just as "bad". Trying to make it hard for cheaters to figure out how to break anticheat is basically required of any anticheat.
BattlEye isn't shady. A lot of extremely popular games use BattlEye.
Take DayZ for instance,instead of fixing an exploit like Duping items they use BattlEye to ban for the abuse of the exploit .(This is according to the Devs and games forum so called Mods who are not taken seriously anymore.Id like to think they(BE) are not involved and the Devs are just spinning the usual BS to cover up their incompetents or unwillingness to solve this problem )
Sounds fair to rid games of players who abuse game mechanics,I have no problem with that.
Then you will have to buy the game again $$
But what if the same exploit/s have been in the game from 2012 to this very day while others have put an end to the same exploit/s long ago with their own anti cheats?
Incompetent devs or deliberately so to raise revenue?
Well its fixing exploits doesn't raise revenue.Ther's no money to be had by removing these exploit/s,buts there's alot more to be gained by leaving them there
Well don't cheat you say,I don't, but that's not stopping others from getting an unfair advantage from an exploit thats been deliberately left in the game to simply raise revenue.And this is totally different from using 3rd party software to again advantage
The other issue with BattleEye I have is that you can get banned from a game without them supplying any proofs/evidence that you did cheat
Cus we say so isn't proof
Now Punkbuster on the other hand will show as much evidence as they can,screen shots of aimbots, wallhacks ect.your ip.the game/match you were cheating in and you can see the KDs/score all on a wall of shame
Puts on Tinfoil hat
And with these anti cheats and what information are they gathering and where does it end up?,If we have to ask,its far to much
... the only time anyone has found anything questionable was about two years ago when they noticed it was reading through DNS entries. There was a lot of shouting and complaining until Gabe Newell went on Reddit and explained what it was doing in an attempt to try and STOP cheats.
https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/1y70ej/valve_vac_and_trust/
Aside from that one time, no-ones ever really raised big concerns over privacy invasions...