Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Even cheaper Intel CPUs like i3 (Sandy Bridge 2, Ivy Bridge, Haswell) or the latest Pentium G series will blow it out from the water with 3-4x overall better score in various benchmarks.
That CPU is too weak for modern gaming. By AMD A8 is the minimal, A10 or FX series is the optimal for gaming purproses. Otherwise if you can afford, go team Intel. Their core technology is 2 years ahead of AMD.
Although with lack of funds, probably now I would go for a AMD-A10, some games simply demand 4 cores, and Intel let that to be paid.
Also, a lot depends on which resolution and details you play.
apperentlty my graphics is AMD Radeon HD 8330 im not sure tho
i usually play at low to medium everything
AMD extremly benefits from fast RAM (1600 or more) with high Mhz and low latency (9)
It can compensate their weak L2 cache and the lacking L3 cache what is much better designed by Intel CPU's.
By what AMD always wins, is that the integrated Radeon is far better as any Intel HD graphics.
Still not on the level of a dedicated GPU though.
If I take only the CPU I would say 3/10, and if the APU then 4/10. Sorry, but if I compare you to regular players here who have i5 and a GTX 970, it comes out just poorly.