Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Even cheaper Intel CPUs like i3 (Sandy Bridge 2, Ivy Bridge, Haswell) or the latest Pentium G series will blow it out from the water with 3-4x overall better score in various benchmarks.
That CPU is too weak for modern gaming. By AMD A8 is the minimal, A10 or FX series is the optimal for gaming purproses. Otherwise if you can afford, go team Intel. Their core technology is 2 years ahead of AMD.
Although with lack of funds, probably now I would go for a AMD-A10, some games simply demand 4 cores, and Intel let that to be paid.
Also, a lot depends on which resolution and details you play.
apperentlty my graphics is AMD Radeon HD 8330 im not sure tho
i usually play at low to medium everything
AMD extremly benefits from fast RAM (1600 or more) with high Mhz and low latency (9)
It can compensate their weak L2 cache and the lacking L3 cache what is much better designed by Intel CPU's.
By what AMD always wins, is that the integrated Radeon is far better as any Intel HD graphics.
Still not on the level of a dedicated GPU though.
If I take only the CPU I would say 3/10, and if the APU then 4/10. Sorry, but if I compare you to regular players here who have i5 and a GTX 970, it comes out just poorly.