Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
i know.
So to sum it: I would like to share my library as long as both people are playing different games.
I absolutely understand why developers would not sign up for full open access to playing a friend's game. Because then, for every (currently) 5 copies that could have been sold, only 1 will theoretically be sold to a group of 5 people. That's 1/5 the profit they could make. Business wise, I get it makes no sense, so I see why they said "oh well the owner has this huge downside that they can't play ANY of their games, and if they jump on it kicks the other person out of the game which gives us hope that person will just buy the game? ok this should be fine". So I get it......but I wish Valve could renegotiate this.
Drop the # of accounts that can use family share, and let us opt in to "other accounts" by paying them a monthly fee. Something simple, like 5 bucks. Then go on a "royalty" program (like Spotify does with music) with the developers. They can see which games are played via Family Library sharing, so give those developers a share of the 5 dollars (negotiate it so everyone is happy) based on if their game is played. That would be a happy medium for us with kids that want to share our library with our kid, but play another game in the meantime through steam.
Still won't stop abusers willing to share with every random person out there.