Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
Steam needs to decrypt and decompress chunks of data in real time and therefore throttles the download if the drive cannot keep up with it
I understand that, but it doesn't explain why a 1TB Western Digital, old and super used (like 10 years old) ends up downloading faster. My 2TB Seagate used to be fine, now most of the time is at 0b/s or 1 MB/s.
Something is up and I can't figure out what.
Besides, like I said and I quote:
"An example, I started downloading a game for 2 minutes on the Seagate one. I managed to download 867 mb/s... while doing it on Western Digital, in just 1 minute I was 1.5GBs downloaded."
Taking this real example, what you said is true, but the problem here must be different, otherwise I would have had the same results on both of them since both are 7.2k rpm