Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
However, using a VPN with Steam comes with some risks and limitations. According to Steam's Subscriber Agreement, you are not allowed to use a VPN to make purchases from the Steam Store while using a VPN. This is because Steam may adjust the prices of games based on your location, and using a VPN to buy games at lower prices is considered fraud. If you violate this rule, Steam may suspend or terminate your account.
Therefore, it is ok to use a VPN while gaming on Steam, as long as you do not use it to make purchases from the Steam Store while using a VPN. You should also make sure that you use a reliable and fast VPN that works well with Steam, such as ExpressVPN, NordVPN, or Surfshark. These VPNs have strong security features, large server networks, and fast speeds that can enhance your gaming experience on Steam.
well put, there is not a grey area to debat, steam way, until they want to change it.
With this logic in place, I owe it to myself to use a VPN. See, my internet provider is Starlink. Even though I live in the mountains of Maine (population of my small town = 900), Starlink reports that I live in the middle of Manhattan (population of New York City ~8 million) - over 400 miles and 5 states away. How am I to know if I am being charged more for a game since Steam "thinks" I live in New York City than a possible lower price offered to rural, or Maine-residing, or any-other-criteria-I-don't-know-about gamers? For the same reason that it's being said that VPNs are not allowed, I am being encouraged to use one.
Which is just another example of why the rule is effectively meaningless. It's arbitrary, and it's only purpose, if the stated information is true, is to increase profits (but not sales!) for Steam. It expects gamers to forego their security to a company that actively spies on them anyway. Maybe it's time to put up a google alert for "Steam" and "class action lawsuit" again.
Because they live in a part of the world where people earn more money. Someone who earns $800 a month is not going to spend $70 on a video game. Plus tax laws that are different everywhere.
Also, publishers choose what regional prices they want.