Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The 1080 will be slightly faster than a 980 Ti, which struggles heavily with 4k.
Some food for thought:
Display wise: a 1080p res is approx 2 million pixels, 3440*1440 ultrawide resolution is approx 5 million, with 4k you're looking at 8 million - quite a difference, wouldn't you say?
Sweetspot for GTX 1080 will be / is around 1440p resolution (aspect ratio aside).
War Thunder and Skyrim shouldn't be a problem in 4k, Witcher 3 on the other hand is not doable with the usual 60 FPS.
Depending on the game you also might bottleneck because of your CPU - maybe you have noticed that already in RoTR.
Now if you're fine chilling on your couch at 30 FPS, then a 1080 at 4k will be fine again.
So, as you can see, it depends.
GTX 1080 can run @ 2160p / 60 FPS no problems
Heck a single 980 Ti had no issues doing that in most games; and the 1080 is way stronger
Witcher 3? RoTR? Upcoming titles? > not even close.
lower 2 are 4k.
As i said: not even close.
With lots of room for OC certainly a neat card though.