安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
no you do, more games have I7 as requirement and you fail here with a I5 and I3
your own problem if a game dont can or use max settings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLSPub4ydiM
as linus said here at 2:45.
''I7 can have anywhere from two processing cores all the way to 8 processing cores in a workstation , it's might support from 2 stick of memory all the way to 8 and can have a TDP or anywhere from around 10 watts all the way to 130 watts , so there is a tons of variety there''
and even most of the he sais it , it's only tend to have more chache and better turbo clock but it's not always the case ... I've seen peoples complain on a forum about why his I7 was bad at running games and it turn out his specific I7 was a budget cpu meant to not draw a lot's of power and not to run games at all.
saying I7 without mentioning a generation or even giving an example of a model is completly useless because of how wide the performances are from one I7 cpu to the other when you actually take the time and search into the subject instead of pretending you know everything.
if you dont bother reading what intel said why bother read here. and do play newer games then you just kill most i3 and i5 pc. then you know what we other talking about. its like ppl have worst of the worst they dont as long you meet game devs requirement then they dont care what you have.
if you pick two cpu from the same generation a lot's of the time both the I5 and I7 cpu will have the same performances in a lot's of games because sometime the only major feature the I7 will have over the I5 is hyperthreading.
and I9 depending on the game you play might be just a waste of money because up to now a lot's of games can't use more then 4 cores ... so even if you have an I9 in some specific games you won't get more FPS compared to an I5 of the same generation because on a per-core level the performances are similar.
you have no clue of what you're talking about and even the website you linked say different things then what you posted yourself.
and they do it on purpose so you think you are right in buy whatever pc, and clap the hands then you agree with them. ( that still has nothing to do with much power and newest in each generation.
and this is completly beside the points and out of subject because right now , we're not giving advice to someone who want to build a computer ...
we are giving advice to someone so that person can understand what game her current computer can play and from what she was telling she's playing very casual games where she won't need 120 fps and super ultra graphic settings.
and its here you lack of educations is , i5 still better then I3 if game devs said require i5.
we have seen so many threads with i3 pc with micro lack on a top ace pc and a old i5 pc has no issue at all.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2811882491
and in specific situation you can have an I3 that actually beat an I5 ... it's a benchmark from a known youtube channels on CSGO , a game where cpu is almost always the performance bottleneck.
not just that but if you buy a new laptop you might even want to to look informations and reviews about the specific laptop you're gonna buy.
sometime even the thermal and laptop ventillations can affect the laptop by a very large margin.
sometime you might get more bangs for your bucks by having a slower cpu but faster graphic cards , it's depend specifically on which games you play.
ps.
i think you are more offender in what you have in I3 or i5 pc, then to accept other higher i7+ pc is even better.
has nothing to do with best buck for money in what you can afford.
point is we dont care about i3 pc anymore. and i5 is still middle range
again ... it's might be true in some case but in practice we're talking about laptops and there is another part of the laptop that count sometime even more to gaming perfomance then the cpu and it's the gpu which is also known as the graphic processing units.
when you look at the benchmark performance of an i5-1135G7 and the laptop that OP has , with this cpu in it's obvious that the performance bottleneck is always gonne be the integrated graphics in it.
OP is gonna be playing casual puzzles game and the most obvious reason her laptop is having a bit of performance issues is because she's gaming on low end graphics chipset which sometime have problems running even less demanding games in 1080P which is the currently most used resolution in modern computers.
your problem is that you only provide opinions and advice based on what you think is better for yourself and not what the OP might actually need.
not just that but if OP is only playing puzzles games ... it's also mean she's might not even need a new computer before a long time because there is only gonna be 1 game out of ten in average from what she buy that might force her to lower the graphics setting and resolution.
and i point out several time hardware matter. and such low resolution as best is not even right its all depend on what Graphic is and then it was made, but notthing prevent a game devs to make a new game to a 386 pc even, fat chance that will happend and depend on who will buy such. so it all come down to what a game devs is aiming for, and same can be said then a pc user buy a pc, low end pc or mid range or high end, and you still going on about low end pc and most user today will not buy a i3 or i5 then i7 and i9 is next gen pc
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i5-1135G7+%40+2.40GHz&id=3830
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/208658/intel-core-i51135g7-processor-8m-cache-up-to-4-20-ghz.html
and look https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-1165G7-vs-Intel-Core-i5-1135G7/m1195374vsm1286124 proofs that you're wrong again between the difference of a I5 and I7 ... look , an I5 and an I7 that have the same performances benchmark.
Go read a book about the dunning Kruger effect because you are knee deep In it about this subject.