Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
No. Even the GTX 670 from 2012 is way faster than the rather pitiful GT 1030.
On Youtube, you can find footage of just about any game imaginable running on just about any GPU imaginable. Actually seeing it played on the hardware you want to play it at can tell you everything you need to know about whether it will be worth it or not.
Problem is minimum requirements and what the developers think is a decent experience may not encompass the depths people are willing to go to play a game on sub-low end hardware. The flipside is any issues you have, or patches that ruin the games performance, you're on your own because everyone can just point at the minimum requirements. And the fact the game ran satisfactory previously is a non-issue. So it's an at your own risk sort of thing.
I think people who aren't running super low end or super high end hardware tend to make a lot of assumptions and guesses about the consequences, and with the Internet you can easily double check those guesses and assumptions and decide for yourself.