Installer Steam
Logg inn
|
språk
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (tradisjonell kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tsjekkisk)
Dansk (dansk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spania)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latin-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (gresk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (nederlandsk)
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasil)
Română (rumensk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et problem med oversettelse
If the issue is disk speed, sure.
At your current speed, of 63mbps, you could get up to 7.8MBps, a SSD would be more than fast enough. again assuming the issue was purely HDD speed. Which is a possibility, but hasn't be fully tested by you.
Mechanical drives, even crappy 5200RPM ones can hit 100+MB\s,
Sure they can. But the caveat is there's plenty of conditions where they'll do much less. And under the worst conditions they can fall into single MB digit MBps ranges.
There isn't one number you can state that will describe HDD performance. Favoring the benchmarks that provide the best performance number doesn't negate all the instances where real world performance is much less.
So I'll agree with other posters that HDDs are crummy. They are. At 5-7MBps I am a bit more skeptical that disk speed is the cause. I believe my post communicated that skepticism. I definitely did not claim it's certainly a disk speed issue. Only that a SSD would solve it if it was. I'm not convinced and it hasn't been tested on his system.
Mb=Mega bits
mgbs=????
Which is a Samsung HD103SJ which was released in 2010.
Use it for data that doesn't require fast access.
Just copied a 7 Gigabyte file from my NAS over the network, had one small dip down to 90 Megabytes per second. Otherwise about 113 Megabytes of writing speed which means the network was the bottleneck, not the drive.
If a HDD from 2010 can pull it off, then i seriously doubt that the OP's HDD is the bottleneck.
Yours has an avg rating of 120/118 R/W.
Looks like mine is an avg of 156/145 R/W.
So unless OP had a laptop HDD, as stated, basically speed capped. Pointless to use an SSD.
Then why are you talking about your Wifi if you're connected via ethernet.