Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
you don't "need" any of those. But SMAA is like inbetween, so go witht hat if MSAA drops your performance too much
MSAA - looks the best but destroys GPUs
SMAA - looks less good but is less GPU intensive
FXAA - looks the 'worst' (on a relative scale) but is the least GPU intensive
If you just want FPS and it look 'kinda' pretty then probably FXAA is fine. If you demand maximum visual fidelity then MSAA is the way to go.
Again its more about where you want the bar of "FPS" and "pretty"
Dont know why you need to ask.
Mostly its cables or thin lines, the rest you wont notice in game. I regularly forget the names, because i just look. In some games the old aa is not enough. Txaa is probably the best for fps and aa, there is another that is better, but i forgot the name. Its something with 2x in it, and movie or so.
If Im using a computer monitor I prefer smaa because it doesnt have the smearing of fxaa at lower reoslutions and doesnt tank performance like MSAA.
I havent dealt with Nvidias new DLAA, but it looked legit in the reviews