Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
We all know the answers here but still.
The question is does Activision's policy of maintaining higher prices bring in higher revenue ? Even if the lost "tail" sales exceeded the value of the higher prices Activision may still prefer its policy to maintain CoD as a premium product.
There's also another issue. Online FPSs are plagued by abusive behaviour and cheating. People may be more intimidated about risking a ban on a game they bought for £20 than a game they bought for £5.
Their downside is there's a lot of gamers (like me) who'd pay £5.00 for Modern Warfare or Black Ops who won't pay £20 so the player base is reduced as a result. Also I may never buy these games now because in graphics terms and perhaps gameplay the older titles in the franchise are now so far behind the curve.
S.x.
S.x.
Don't see the point in wasting your time and theirs on some fruitless charade especially when you actively play their products.
Pointless really.
because it is not uncommon for customer service agents to answer a question they think they know the answer to, and not realize they are wrong.
because the CEO is the top dog and if he ends up agreeing with you guess who he will talk to about lowering the prices?
Yes he made a mistake by telling you Steam sets the prices. Note: He might actually believe they are - retails stores do and he might be confusing this, as he actually has no more information about marketing Activision games than you do.