Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Running out of stock, and unable to fulfill your order, and only option is to refund is not agasint the law, as they're returning the money. If this was agasint the law, then any place that ran out of stock can be sue just for running out of stock by this logic, even if means discontinued, and really this is more of a abuse to businesses to force them to cost them more money.
You order TV online, they tell you it's out of stock or discontinued, would you sue them for it because they couldn't fulfill your order? Would you walk into a convenience store, asked if there any more pepis in the backroom because don't see in front, and paid in advance then came back, and told you to take your money back, and told you they ran out, are you going out of your way to sue them because they ran out? Just let that sit for a moment, and notice how prejudice that sounds by this logic. Which is unethical really.
Can have a case if they're holding your money, and not providing what was agree on, but since this is not a hostage on your money, and refund are being given.
Also BTW I'm still waiting on that link where you pull the content you posted from before, which I asked few days ago.
Believing my intention was to only ask if someone else had the same thing happen to them and it turned to 42 page post with over 600+ comments, I love the steam community
For what I understand, it is from Germany(So, by no mean an EU wide law).
There's what I found: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/englisch_bgb.html#p1551
The section 280 of this also talk about damage instead of the "performance" which, in my understanding, is the refund.
I read the refunds terms, and time frame is no where even close to what someone ranting about, as it's less than a week when the refund happen, compare to month's that in the website terms... So really no grounds at all to be ranting, so not only he ignore the rest of the terms that were listed below. Also to add there are several sections for related to refunds.
This thread is on the wane. There's not much to fight about now. No one is going to get banned for whining about compensation. Soon, everyone will have gotten their refund or their controller and this thread will be forgotten. It was fun while it lasted.
Mine still hasn't shipped man. I read on reddit that someone who ordered on the 26th had theirs canceled yesterday. This is giving me stupid anxiety.
I'd honestly be happy if one shipped early and the other one came at some other time weeks later. I just want to try the controller out in some FPS games,some arpg's and maybe some fighting games.
I'm super curious if I can get the left touch pad to emulate a d-pad. The standard d-pad hurts my effing thumb after some play so if that works out well then I've finally found my answer to the ancient d-pad.
Well sorry but I want to try out the gyro aim thing out man lol. I imagine its superior to the wonky crane control joysticks.
As I wrote before:
Opening up a sale without having, within reason, adequate supply to be able to service expected demand -- is in some member states of the EU judged as illegal. There have been cases in courts in at least the Netherlands and Belgium before where traders were found guilty.
Simple explanation:
You have to be crazy to sue over small sums like 5 EUR (or ~20 EUR incl. shipping).
On top of that, many courts dismiss cases below certain damage thresholds and most member states in the EU don't allow class action suits.
(You can kind of start a class action by chartering a new foundation and having the foundation sue in name of its members, but it's a lot of administrative and monetary overhead. And the types of people skilled at setting these up are usually also skilled at ensuring a lot is skimmed off the top for themselves.)
Anyone who thinks anything here has been "illegal", may contact their litigator. I think you'll fi9nd you are mistaken.