Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Some people may prefer CS:GO with something like low anything but high shadows or whatever it is and the competitive settings in Fortnite for clearity, some in CS:GO pick a 3:4 resolution for fatter characters (but smaller field of view) to make it easier to aim, beyond that going with a lower resolution is all about frame-rate.
Most pros have been playing cs since before 1080p was standard, and stick with what they are used to
The one thing the pros do use tends to be smaller panels so they can see it all easier in their natural cone of vision.
But, really, unless your competing for big prize pots ... It's not going to make much difference, even if you are, the difference is minimal, but when there's money on the line, you'll take any minute benefit.
When you get above 100fps / Hz the diminishing returns for shorter frame times really begin to get less and less noticeable, by the time your above 200Hz your gaining only one or two milliseconds improvement over 144, which has something like a 12 millisecond gain over 60.
Mind your own business and do what you do. As long as you're fine with your experience, you're fine.
Personally i also think really smooth in CSGO starts around ~250-300+ FPS (minimum, not average!), which is harder to achieve with higher resolutions, especially on some maps.
Considering you play on a nice 165 hz display, you're more at an advantage than vice versa anyways.
Uhm, that's actually a misconception btw.
Those headsets are mostly used for the mic at best, and you use in-ears while playing. Otherwise the background noise would be unbearable. At least i don't know anyone who actually used sponsored crap like that.
Yes it will matter somewhat if your skill is equal.
It's not an issue to get 144fps on modern hardware, especially not for pro gamers.
The main reason pro gamers still do not use 27 inch or above is the screen size itself.
- more screen estate equals much more eye scan
- more cursor distance to cover
- some pro players even play certain games windowed to limit eye scan
If you want the 27 inch for better quality and immersive gaming (rpg etc ..). Try playing those competive games on 1080p without scaling so you have black borders but you keep the crisp quality. Not perfect as you need to adapt to mouse sens etc. If all you care about is winning fps games at highest level possible (skill remains the biggest factor though) only look for 1080p 22-24 inch 120hz-240hz gaming monitors