Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Those are the punishments for the guilty.
Force Valve to give the needed data to be able to sue the scammer.
But:
As much as I like Steam. Valve is NOT nice to people who use the law against bad people.
One company got review bombed and attacked, they used the law to stop that abuse, Valve stopped working together with that company.
So:
Don't use the law, Valve will not help you, they will punish you if you do it like a normal citizen. Your only chance seems to be to go unlawful. Learn hacking or buy the service of people who do it. This is not how it should be. But as long as Valve protects bad people and punishes people who follow the law...
Do you really want your government, lawmakers, GAFAM and internet providers to chose for you and make you pay extra bills for any content you access on the internet? Valve don't protect bad people, they do everything they can to warn their customers and still... also Valve doesn't care if you take action, no the real problem is if administrations and courts get progressively flooded by that kind of dumb complaint cases over non existent items, the service will be terminated and everybody lose.
If you want to punish scammers, trading only here is a good start. Scammers and other "bad people" take advantage of the same freedom we enjoy on internet, it's like that since the beginning, WE are responsible of our acts and by acting responsibly maybe we can help to save net neutrality instead of accelerating its fall.
The debate about idealistic value of an item beyond its material value is a long one, but one, that tends to be accepted by law. A painting harbors more value than that of the canvas, the colours and the time to paint (or reprint) it. A rare "collectors item" is more valuable than an almost identical replica. "Prestigious" materials like gold, silver and diamonds are sold significantly beyond their material value. Buying a Lamborghini is different from buying a VW Mini.
In all these cases, the part of the value, that is only based on ideas and nonexistent factors makes a significant part, that will be recognized by legal instances. And ultimately, digital items fall in the same category.
So if you see a difference between destroying a photocopy of a Duerer painting and destroying the original, you maybe should learn to accept, that fighting theft of nonmaterial possessions is not "dumb".
Yeah you're right that's not exactly what I tried to say. I'm still questioning myself about this economy... also people get scammed everyday while using different services and the law take care of them, so why not Steam users who lost items, you're right it's not dumb. It's just scams can easily be avoided and because you are free to trade outside of steam despite the warning, doesn't mean you can blame Valve to be on the side of the scammers, it's a bit exagerated...
We know scammers rarely get caught so for op: the best way to "punish" them is to stop falling in their scams. Of course I think people should go to police when they lost too much, but for everything? If the number of complaints become significant, and worse, come mostly from minors, one day a politician will look at it and choose the "best" option: steam market closed for the country, problem solved. Not impossible but it's only my opinion.
Agreed! lol and I need more time I think to have a fair opinion. Cheers
With the amount of users Steam has, I would take a guess and say hundreds of thousands if not millions of trades happen on a daily basis along with thousands of those being scams. Valve is not the gaming police. They don't have to authority to take "legal action" against anyone when it comes to scams besides banning accounts.
They took so many measures to try and keep people safe. Steam Guard, Steam Guard Mobile Authenticator (or as some like to call it: Authentificator), and endless prompts and confirmations.
Before a trade can take place, you have to confirm the trade multiple times and if you are giving things away, there are huge warnings which say something like "You are giving your items away and expect nothing in return. Yes or Cancel."
How much more do you want Valve to do? Should they have employees sitting next to users to hold their hands through every single trade?
If you live in the US and are scammed by someone in Poland, what is Valve supposed to do when you say "legal action"? Valve isn't going to report anyone to American or Polish police or help you sue anyone. Even you have to admit that would be completely ludicrous. If you wanted to get a lawyer and sue the user and have the lawyer subpoena information about the other person, that might be a way to go. But your lawyer fees are going to exceed what you lost in pixels.
There is so much information and safeguards when trading through the Steam platform, you really, really, really have to go out of your way to be scammed.
I'm sorry you got scammed. I know it sucks but going forward, you have to use the thing between your ears. You have to have some basic common sense and don't get blinded by greed. And most importantly, read the Recommended Trading Practices and Steam Trading articles in the knowledge base because it is clear you have not yet done so.
You have a very different perspective of that whole situation - here's a counterpoint:
https://steamed.kotaku.com/digital-homicide-drops-18-million-lawsuit-against-stea-1787361452
As for avoiding scams... well, this.
I'd also add that you might want to develop a healthy dose of cynicism. Very few people trust big business, politicians or whoever else that you want to blame for the world's ills - however, it's perfectly OK to trust some anonymous random on the inetrnet who says that they'll give you money? Maybe not.
I don't see a counterpoint.
Let me quote:
So, the counterpointis, "they were a toilet explosion"?
Or where in that linked article do you find any counterpoint?
I'll not discuss this with you for too long as your support for those guys makes you look highly suspect - also, it would be derailing the thread too much. Come back when you're willing to discuss how they got themselves in that mess, and not before.