For what games a GTX 1060 6Gb is not enough?

[Ocelote.12]

Can someone please give me a list of games for which a GTX 1060 6Gb is not enough for average of 70fps on a 1080p@60Hz monitor?

I want highest settings possible except antialiasing, which still must be on but doesn't have to be MSAA if the game has other less resource-hungry AA options. I don't really need MSAA.

[[LTT] LinusFTW]

The 1060 is good enough for all games at 1080P ultra settings, it's once you go above 1080P the 1060 struggles.

[Ocelote.12]

Цитата допису LTT LinusFTW:

The 1060 is good enough for all games at 1080P ultra settings, it's once you go above 1080P the 1060 struggles.

This benchmark below shows that, for example, in Mirror's Edge Catalyst on Hyper (highest) settings, at 1080p, GTX 1060 gets only average 52fps (45fps minimum), while GTX 1070 gets average 70fps (61fps minimum).
http://www.techspot.com/review/1209-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060/page5.html

So for this specific game, GTX 1070 is smoother to play on even on at 1080p@60Hz monitor.
I'd like to know about other such games.

[SoldierScar]

It's a great graphics card, it will run most of the games no problem with 60+ fps. I got overclocked mine at 2ghz (core clock) and 4350 mhz (memory clock), adds 5-10 fps more than non-overclocked.
From the newer games that i played and got 1080p/60 fps all maxed out with decent AA:
Grand Theft Auto V, Battlefield 1, Just Cause 3, Killing Floor 2, Dying Light - they are greatly playable even in 1440p downsampling but you will get drops to 50 fps.
The games where i couldn't really get stable 60 fps at max were Fallout 4 and Hitman, because they are badly optimized, not even gtx 1080 can't get stable 60 fps in Fallout 4.
The older games from 2014 and older are easily playable in 1440p or 4k @ 60 fps.

[Ocelote.12]

Ok, nobody suggested any other game so I had to search for them myself.
What did I find:

Game - fps on 1060 - fps on 1070
1) Mirror's Edge Catalyst - 52 - 70
2) Watch_Dogs 2 - 45 - 64
3) Dishonored 2 - 50 - 70
4) Ashes of the Singularity (DX12) - 46 - 62
5) The Division - 58 - 80
6) The Witcher 3 with Hairworks On - 47 - 65

Probably that's all. Or have I missed some other demanding game?

[SkyDriver]

The human eye cannot process more than 70 frames a second. Gaming technology is surpassing human visual processing, so anything beyond 65-70fps is a complete waste of money. You can't see any difference over 65-70 fps, and anyone thinks they can is wrong. The 1060 is great for just about any AAA title available in 1080p, and you should be good until the year 2020.

So to answer your question, unless you're playing early access games that are not optimized, or trying to crank up the graphics on Star Citizen to Ultra, no game currently available should be too much for the 1060 on high to Ultra setting.

[Nepgear]

Probably Ghost Recon Wildlands

[nullable]

Цитата допису Ocelote:

Can someone please give me a list of games for which a GTX 1060 6Gb is not enough for average of 70fps on a 1080p@60Hz monitor?.

This is not a realistic request. Between people guessing, being wrong, and other variables in your PC affecting performance where a 1060 6GB in my system could get better results than yours (for example) you're really better off looking up games as you consider buying them as opposed to trying make an arbitrary and questionable list.

[nullable]

Цитата допису Scarrage:

The human eye cannot process more than 70 frames a second. Gaming technology is surpassing human visual processing, so anything beyond 65-70fps is a complete waste of money. You can't see any difference over 65-70 fps, and anyone thinks they can is wrong.

Source? Because you are wrong. Or at the very least it's much more complicated than human beings can see X. Different parts of the eye see differently. Your brain does all sorts of tricks in visual processing. How we're presented visuals has a significant impact on how we percieve them which is why films at 24FPS look fine, but a CRT at 60hz looks bad, but why a LCD at 60hz way better.

All I can say as refresh rates get higher you do get diminishing returns. So yeah in a lot of cases 70-80FPS are going to look almost as good as 120FPS. And most people don't care enough to tell the difference. I don't think I can in normal gaming usage. I use a 144hz LCD now, and can run plenty of games at 100+ FPS and the monitor does look amazing compared to my old 60hz in games with lots of fast movement. But I still use the 60hz for my Switch, and it still looks pretty great.

https://www.pcgamer.com/how-many-frames-per-second-can-the-human-eye-really-see/ but here's an example how it's just not as simple as you seem to be claiming.

[Reaper]

Цитата допису Scarrage:

The human eye cannot process more than 70 frames a second. Gaming technology is surpassing human visual processing, so anything beyond 65-70fps is a complete waste of money. You can't see any difference over 65-70 fps, and anyone thinks they can is wrong.

Do you think vaccines cause autism as well? Because you sound exactly like those people when you say things like that while ignoring evidence that proves you wrong