Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
9/10 for graphics on both of them.
They both have pretty good playability.
Sure, it doesn't look too great nowadays, but the graphics were just about par for its day. The NPC interactions and storytelling was what really elevated HL above its contemporaries. Its modability gave rise to Counter-Strike and dozens of other games. Not just mods - actual games that were sold at retail. Take a second and try to find a complete list of how many awards Half-Life has won. It's a long list. And it sold an average of one million units per year for at least five years after its release, not even counting digital sales or other platforms.
I like to think they're equal.
As for Half Life 2,it's good but i prefer TF2 and Portal over it.
Dota 2: Had played wc3 dota 1 for many years before i moved to dota 2, so i had prey good knowledge of the game. For multiplayer game this is the best i have played and by far the most played game i have ever played. (if including dota 1) The beginning is hard but when you learn the basics and success its AWSOME. Every game of this is different.
http://www.pcgamer.com/review/dota-2-review/
Multiplayer: Counter-Strike