Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
That being said, I wonder how many will even read that just like how the Early Access big blue box gets ignored, a lot of people are just "yeah sure whatever agree take me to checkout".
Which means putting in the spotlight that this is a digital service contract and not a contract for the supply of digital content.
This means another EU fine will probably be heading Valve's way for misleading consumers for a decade and counting, as the EU doesn't allow traders to request consumers waive their right of withdrawal - as Valve has actually been doing - for digital services. Requesting waiving of that right is only allowed for contracts for supply of digital content.
Humorously, they actually also made a boo-boo in at least the Dutch translation of said box. If I were to translate that back into English it states that: "With any purchase of a product, you are granted a license for this product on Steam." I.e. it actually acknowledges that you are buying the game as a product, which just so happens to have a license included on Steam on the side.
Stating that fines will happen because it's displayed more forward implies that no one has ever sent the EULA to be analyzed or that the courts are so incompetent, they couldn't enforce their own laws from a decade ago.
That is some nice word salad.
Edit: Let the tantrum commence XD
Judging by the reaction to the latest changes to the SSA, we still need a lot more boxes. Or maybe Gaben needs to go to your house personally and read it to you.
The consumers assumed they had ownership when they NEVER did.
The consumers would fail to read the legally binding contract known as the EULA and would assume they had ownership, when all they had is a license.
All Steam is doing is telling users what they have already been buying.
My opinion is that the USA is way too focused on companies and not the people. Like how it seems people use the word Consumer instead of Customer. Consumer sounds so, I don't know, inhuman? But that's a topic for another time.