Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Hozzászólási szabályok és irányelvek
Hozzászólás jelentése
I can transfer ownership of the DVD.
If the DVD is taken without permission that is theft of property.
Which of these is made false by being unable to show the DVD at a bar?
You were not given a license to publicly broadcast the content on the DVD. There is copyright case law where people have been sued for copyright violation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_Pictures_Industries%2C_Inc._v._Redd_Horne%2C_Inc.
Movie rental stores were sued because they set up screening rooms for small groups. The movie rental store did not have the proper licensing for that even though they owned the media. Owning the media doesn't give carte blanche to do as you please.
None of which has to do with not owning the content on the DVD and having a license.
Also if you don't pay for the DVD and issue a charge back it's not theft to take it back. That is the exact same scenario in which steam takes back a license.
Steam doesn't take back licenses you bought on steam unless the payment was reversed
If you actually owned it then a 3rd party couldn't restrict how you use it in your own property.
Since you don't own it, and have a license they can restrict how you use it
yeah every bit of it is an um actually moment. You have to do like so many levels of intellectual gymnastics to say that first sale doctrine doesn't protect your ownership over physical media more than digital media. You have no rights with digital media. do not give steam or anyone else a cent for anything digital until the state protects our rights as the customers.
Obviously I'm talking about ownership of something that is actually your property.
Isn't the advise going around that if you don't like it to delete your account?
Does that not result in Steam taking back everything you paid for?
Does Steam reverse the payment by issuing a refund in that event?
You still don't own the content on the DVD. Ownership in this sense is for the physical media in which the movie was made available to you. That is the limit of your ownership: the plastic disc.
Again, correct. But what you actually said was...
You are leading to the conclusion that should be able to show the DVD at a bar. Your licensed copy of the movie on that DVD does not allow you to publicly broadcast it. Doing so is a copyright infringement.
They did own the physical copy, which can be sold/traded/etc, and the game as-is so no updates done to "break" it, that is understandable. However their complaints are irrelevant here on a digital store front where there are no physical copies, simply the digital version of what they were already purchasing which would have a license tied to the physical cartridge.
In this case however they can't sell that license as it is tied to their account and Valve won't allow license transfers, this is specifically why things like remote play together and family sharing exist is to allow a way of doing that save for any limitations like bans, 3rd party account, etc however even with those the ones who want to be able to sell their licenses want limitations increased or removed in family sharing (family size, same game at the same time, etc). Asking to have the same game be able to play on 2 different devices from the same account.
Again I understand they want to be able to sell their licenses because that's possible in physical copies (gamestop what not), digitals work the same in terms of licensing but different where they can't sell the license. Essentially they couldn't legally stop people from selling their physical copies but they certainly can when tied to an account and placing limitations.
The scam is that it is advertised as what it is not. "Fish free tuna" does not exist. Nobody reads EULAs etcetera, they aren't even written in a way which is understandable to a majority of people.
Interesting take. this is indeed true for Half life 2 physical release, and TF2, and the Orange Box. However, a physical release of a game in the form of a CD-R or DVD not only contains a license, it also injects code into your computer containing that very game.