PSA: Valve is attempting to censor people that rebel against them
Recently, I have found out that if you put "#killvalve" in your nickname, it will get censored for no actual reason.

Spread the word and please stop feeding their death machine with your money!
Цитата допису: Low Standards:
Цитата допису C²C^Guyver |NZB|:
Цитата допису Pierce Dalton:

I guess it's just to upset the fans of the company. I must say it seems to be working lol.
The fans couldn't care less. It's actually funny. Why? 1. It's the OPs' account getting moderated, no one else. 2. WHY would you do something specifically to get a reaction and then cry foul when you get one?

I think moderation should be reduced. They don't do a good job right now probably because they are understaffed in this area. It would be better to just limit the TOS to a few big things that are easy to recognize.

That said, I don't like the word Kill in this context. It would feel threatening if I were an Steam employee. There are some crazy people out there.
< >
Показані коментарі 196210 із 500
"Death machine" oh boy that's hyperbole. Yeah, free speech doesn't mean what you think it does OP.
Цитата допису Low Standards:
Цитата допису C²C^Guyver |NZB|:
The fans couldn't care less. It's actually funny. Why? 1. It's the OPs' account getting moderated, no one else. 2. WHY would you do something specifically to get a reaction and then cry foul when you get one?

I think moderation should be reduced. They don't do a good job right now probably because they are understaffed in this area. It would be better to just limit the TOS to a few big things that are easy to recognize.

That said, I don't like the word Kill in this context. It would feel threatening if I were an Steam employee. There are some crazy people out there.
Take a second and read what you wrote again. You said you think it should be reduced and then say they're understaffed.

Like, what? That's a great formula if you want to make the problem even worse lol

The TOS doesn't need limiting people just need to learn to act right but since they can't that's why there's rules. Humans can't be trusted to always do the right thing.
I also think it's hilarious that the OP keeps changing the answer to the thread to only replies that suit his agenda.
Цитата допису C²C^Guyver |NZB|:
Цитата допису Low Standards:

I think moderation should be reduced. They don't do a good job right now probably because they are understaffed in this area. It would be better to just limit the TOS to a few big things that are easy to recognize.

That said, I don't like the word Kill in this context. It would feel threatening if I were an Steam employee. There are some crazy people out there.
Take a second and read what you wrote again. You said you think it should be reduced and then say they're understaffed.

Like, what? That's a great formula if you want to make the problem even worse lol

The TOS doesn't need limiting people just need to learn to act right but since they can't that's why there's rules. Humans can't be trusted to always do the right thing.

I think you would think that. With over 83,877+ posts, it seems you are highly vested in this forum. You can't see clearly anymore. I would spend more time outdoors. It might give you a better perspective of what others are talking about. I mean at least find some time to give the benefit of the doubt.
Цитата допису Low Standards:
Цитата допису C²C^Guyver |NZB|:
Take a second and read what you wrote again. You said you think it should be reduced and then say they're understaffed.

Like, what? That's a great formula if you want to make the problem even worse lol

The TOS doesn't need limiting people just need to learn to act right but since they can't that's why there's rules. Humans can't be trusted to always do the right thing.

I think you would think that. With over 83,877+ posts, it seems you are highly vested in this forum. You can't see clearly anymore. I would spend more time outdoors. It might give you a better perspective of what others are talking about. I mean at least find some time to give the benefit of the doubt.
Post count means nothing.

My account is also 20 years old.

Why do I say post count irrelevant? The old forums, we had our post count right under our avatar. We don't here.

Want to try another excuse? Because you really seem to have an issue with someone who has more of something than you do.

You're posting here like I told you before that makes you just as much of a fanboy as anyone else.

And if you really think that just because I have more post than you, then that equates to me not going outside then you really need to get a grip on yourself because you couldn't be more incorrect.
Автор останньої редакції: C²C^Guyver |NZB|; 14 січ. 2024 о 14:38
Цитата допису C²C^Guyver |NZB|:
Цитата допису Low Standards:

I think you would think that. With over 83,877+ posts, it seems you are highly vested in this forum. You can't see clearly anymore. I would spend more time outdoors. It might give you a better perspective of what others are talking about. I mean at least find some time to give the benefit of the doubt.
Post count means nothing.

My account is also 20 years old.

Why do I say postcode is irrelevant? The old forums, we had our post count right under our avatar. We don't here.

Want to try another excuse? Because you really seem to have an issue with someone who has more of something than you do.

You're posting here like I told you before that makes you just as much of a fanboy as anyone else.

I think my previous post shows you are heavily invested in disproving anything that comes your way. You need a fresh perspective at this point.
Цитата допису Low Standards:
Цитата допису C²C^Guyver |NZB|:
Post count means nothing.

My account is also 20 years old.

Why do I say postcode is irrelevant? The old forums, we had our post count right under our avatar. We don't here.

Want to try another excuse? Because you really seem to have an issue with someone who has more of something than you do.

You're posting here like I told you before that makes you just as much of a fanboy as anyone else.

I think my previous post shows you are heavily invested in disproving anything that comes your way. You need a fresh perspective at this point.
Projection is strong here. Except you ain't even trying to disprove anything. You just call people fanboy, which is even lower.

Don't preach standards you are unable to conform to yourself.
And you don't think it makes you look bad that everyone knows that you got moderated even here and in the starfield forums and it makes it look like you're just complaining?

You need to stop pointing your fingers at everyone else and look at yourself is what you need to start doing. I didn't get banned in Steam discussions and I didn't get banned in the Starfield hub all because I thought I could say whatever I want and now I'm mad because I realize I can't.

What I am telling you is the truth because your attitude instantly changed when you got banned in Steam discussions and it has only amplified since you got that forum ban in the Starfield hub, so as you can guess, it is hard, very hard to take anything you say seriously. It just comes off as "I'm mad"

If you don't like getting moderated, stop posting things that you know are going to get yourself moderated. It's a really simple concept.
Автор останньої редакції: C²C^Guyver |NZB|; 14 січ. 2024 о 12:54
Цитата допису Thermal Pineapple:
Цитата допису Low Standards:

I think my previous post shows you are heavily invested in disproving anything that comes your way. You need a fresh perspective at this point.
Projection is strong here. Except you ain't even trying to disprove anything. You just call people fanboy, which is even lower.

Don't preach standards you are unable to conform to yourself.

You are worse because you are doing the same thing and just pretending it is better because people here agree with you.

First, I answered the OP's question, which is why he posted it as an answer. Everything else is just you and the others trying to derail the conversation. :steamthumbsup:
Цитата допису C²C^Guyver |NZB|:
And you don't think it makes you look bad that everyone knows that you got moderated even here and in the starfield forums and it makes it look like you're just complaining?

You need to stop pointing your fingers at everyone else and look at yourself is what you need to start doing. I didn't get banned in Steam discussions and I didn't get banned in the Starfield hub all because I thought I could say whatever I want and now I'm mad because I realize I can't.

What I am telling you is the truth because your attitude instantly changed when you got banned in Steam discussions and it has only amplified since you got that forum ban in the Starfield hub, so as you can guess, it is hard, very hard to take anything you say seriously. It just comes off as "I'm mad"

If you don't like getting moderated, stop posting things that you know are going to get yourself moderated. It's a really simple concept.

Maybe you are talking about yourself. I answered the question. You just write too much. I don't know what you are trying to prove at this point. It is just weird.
Цитата допису Low Standards:
Цитата допису C²C^Guyver |NZB|:
And you don't think it makes you look bad that everyone knows that you got moderated even here and in the starfield forums and it makes it look like you're just complaining?

You need to stop pointing your fingers at everyone else and look at yourself is what you need to start doing. I didn't get banned in Steam discussions and I didn't get banned in the Starfield hub all because I thought I could say whatever I want and now I'm mad because I realize I can't.

What I am telling you is the truth because your attitude instantly changed when you got banned in Steam discussions and it has only amplified since you got that forum ban in the Starfield hub, so as you can guess, it is hard, very hard to take anything you say seriously. It just comes off as "I'm mad"

If you don't like getting moderated, stop posting things that you know are going to get yourself moderated. It's a really simple concept.

Maybe you are talking about yourself. I answered the question. You just write too much. I don't know what you are trying to prove at this point. It is just weird.
We're done. Projecting onto others is not a viable argument and that's all you're doing.

Maybe you should stop posting on the forums for a while because you don't have a point anyway. What's weird is you keep saying that this place is so awful and full of fanboys, yet you simply can't seem to pull yourself away.
Автор останньої редакції: C²C^Guyver |NZB|; 14 січ. 2024 о 14:41
Цитата допису C²C^Guyver |NZB|:
Цитата допису Low Standards:

Maybe you are talking about yourself. I answered the question. You just write too much. I don't know what you are trying to prove at this point. It is just weird.
We're done. Projecting onto others is not a viable argument and that's all you're doing.

Maybe you should stop posting on the forums for a while because you don't have a point anyway. What's weird is you keep saying that this place is so awful and full of fanboys, yet you simply can't seem to pull yourself away.

Yet you were ignored by the poster and couldn't answer his question yet you tell me I don't have a point.
Цитата допису Low Standards:
Цитата допису C²C^Guyver |NZB|:
We're done. Projecting onto others is not a viable argument and that's all you're doing.

Maybe you should stop posting on the forums for a while because you don't have a point anyway. What's weird is you keep saying that this place is so awful and full of fanboys, yet you simply can't seem to pull yourself away.

Yet you were ignored by the poster and couldn't answer his question yet you tell me I don't have a point.
Ignored by who? This entire topic doesn't have a point. It is just another topic complaining about moderation when the moderation in question was totally deserved.

Are you in the OP both clueless or what? What exactly did you both expect to happen?

He changed his name to a threat and also wrote derogatory remarks on his profile.

What you two don't understand is, this is not your playground. You are not in charge and you do not make the rules.

The account maybe yours and no one else can use it, but that still doesn't mean that you can use it as you see fit, there are rules.

Last post.
Автор останньої редакції: C²C^Guyver |NZB|; 14 січ. 2024 о 14:47
Цитата допису C²C^Guyver |NZB|:
Цитата допису Low Standards:

Yet you were ignored by the poster and couldn't answer his question yet you tell me I don't have a point.
Ignored by who? This entire topic doesn't have a point. It is just another topic complaining about moderation when the moderation in question was totally deserved.

Are you in the OP both clueless or what? What exactly did you both expect to happen?

He changed his name to a threat and also wrote derogatory remarks on his profile.

What you two don't understand is, this is not your playground. You are not in charge and you do not make the rules.

The account maybe yours and no one else can use it, but that still doesn't mean that you can use it as you see fit, there are rules.

Last post.

Yes, Sherriff. Now get outside, please!
Цитата допису Low Standards:
Yes, Sherriff. Now get outside, please!
Oh irony, you beautiful mistress.
< >
Показані коментарі 196210 із 500
На сторінку: 1530 50

Опубліковано: 12 січ. 2024 о 3:27
Дописів: 500