Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I understand your viewpoint that there may be limitations to freedom of speech on privately owned forums. While it is true that private platforms have the right to establish rules and guidelines for their communities, it is important to delve deeper into the concept of freedom of speech and its relationship with privately owned forums.
First and foremost, it’s essential to distinguish between freedom of speech as a constitutional right and the policies set by private entities. Freedom of speech, as enshrined in many democratic societies, primarily protects individuals from government censorship or interference. However, private platforms, as independent entities, have the right to establish their own rules to maintain a certain standard of behavior and promote the values they deem important.
While privately owned forums may have restrictions on certain types of speech, this does not necessarily mean that freedom of speech is entirely absent. Instead, it reflects the platforms’ responsibility to create a safe and inclusive environment for users, ensuring that discussions remain respectful and free from harassment, hate speech, or other forms of harmful content.
It is worth noting that private forums often have guidelines in place to strike a balance between freedom of expression and maintaining a positive community atmosphere. These guidelines aim to prevent the spread of misinformation, personal attacks, or content that could incite violence or discrimination. By setting these standards, platforms can foster healthy discussions and protect the well-being of their users.
While it may be disappointing to some that private forums do not fully uphold the concept of unrestricted freedom of speech, it’s important to recognize the benefits of moderation and community guidelines. These measures can help maintain a welcoming and constructive space for individuals to engage in meaningful discussions without fear of harassment or abuse.
Furthermore, it’s crucial to remember that there are numerous platforms available where individuals can freely express their opinions without facing the same restrictions. Public spaces such as public forums, social media platforms, and personal blogs provide alternative avenues for individuals to exercise their right to freedom of speech.
In conclusion, while privately owned forums may have limitations on freedom of speech, it’s essential to acknowledge the rationale behind these restrictions. Moderation and community guidelines aim to foster a positive environment for users, protecting them from harmful content and ensuring respectful dialogue. As users, we can choose platforms that align with our values while also engaging in discussions on public forums that offer a more open space for expression.
Let’s continue to advocate for respectful and constructive dialogue, both in privately owned forums and public platforms, while respecting the rights and responsibilities of each platform owner
Rather than resorting to personal attacks or dismissive language, let’s focus on addressing the points made and engaging in a meaningful exchange of ideas. This approach allows for a more productive and respectful conversation.
While it’s true that Valve holds significant control over their forums and platform, it’s important to continue discussing and advocating for changes that can improve user experiences. By expressing our concerns and engaging in constructive conversations, we can potentially influence Valve’s decision-making process and encourage positive changes to take place. It’s not productive to dismiss the possibility of change without actively engaging in discussions and sharing our viewpoints.
I'm not openly discussing my thoughts on Freedom Of Speech.
It's a stupid Topic.
The forums are provided as a courtesy, one that seems to be abused nonstop. Should just do away with them.
That's funny wanting free speech but only if it agrees with them.
And no, on private servers you can't have free speech.
You are STILL not entitled to force anyone to platform you.
I have to agree here. Steam/Valve really need to get rid of forums completely.
Put your money where your mouth is and lead by example.
The phrase “Your freedom of speech ends where their freedom to not listen begins” is a popular way of summarizing the concept of the limits of free speech. However, I believe that it oversimplifies the issue.
The right to free speech is an essential aspect of any free and democratic society. It allows individuals to express their ideas, opinions, and beliefs, even if they are unpopular or controversial. However, this right is not absolute. It can be limited to protect the rights and interests of others, such as their right to privacy, safety, or freedom from discrimination.
Therefore, the issue is not simply a matter of where one person’s freedom ends and another’s begins. Rather, it requires a delicate balance between competing rights and interests. For example, while individuals have the right to express their views, they also have a responsibility to do so in a way that does not harm or intimidate others.
In conclusion, the phrase “Your freedom of speech ends where their freedom to not listen begins” is a catchy way of summarizing the limits of free speech, but it does not capture the full complexity of the issue. It is important to remember that the right to free speech is not absolute and can be limited to protect the rights and interests of others.
Game development is not a democracy nor should it be. It is a creative endeavor. Artists do not need your ideas, especially given how bad they seem to be