Comment if you want Valve to stop selling hentai materials

[Coinkydink]

Enough is enough. Why is Steam showing hentai garbage at the top of the "popular new relases" ?

This rapey anti-woman culture must be removed from Steam. It has nothing to do with "art" and everything to do with psychological and emotional DISEASE.

[Noc]

I don't want them to stop selling cuz that corner of the platform is gonna make alot of money and keep our servers online longer than without.

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Messaggio originale di SlowMango:

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

A 16 year olds bare buttocks is considered cp under us law. Not even getting into the full blown sex scenes involving a 16 year old.

"Child pornography under federal law is defined as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age)"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_the_United_States

For the love of god, stop making things up. Whats creepy is people defending this trash. Thats whats creepy.

A bare butt isn't considered CP.

Otherwise, parents who post pictures of their kids playing in sprinklers and such naked would be charged with distributing CP.

Do parents post pics of their kids having full blown sex, because this game also shows a 16 year old having full blown sex. And the particular scenerio you mention is a fine line. If you post naked pics of your child you should go to jail for one and technically, under us law as it's written it is cp. So stop defendong cp, its absolutely disgusting.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Messaggio originale di ❤ Succubus with BFG ❤:

In the United States law the depictions of REAL PHOTOS are against the law, this does not apply to digital items such as those of games, movies or media that do not feature real life people, the law would however fall to 5 questions

1: Is the picture or media of a real person in any way?
2: Is the picture or media related to any human that exists?
3: Is it nudity or direct sexual conduct? (Note: Within bylaws that the United States reserves the right to waver action suites against claims of these types of its simply nudity)
4: If the prior three standards are not met, is it of any real person from history?
5: If none of the prior four standards apply, is the figure in any way shape or form to realistic?

If the media does not fall within those standard laws which for the record wikipedia is full of nonsense as it ignores all the regulations entirely then what you claimed is not only wrong, but liable for slander which can be prosecuted at the courts authority for false report of child sexual endangerment laws.

Very incorrect

"The law enacted 18 U.S.C. § 1466A, which criminalizes material that has "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting" that "depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is obscene" or "depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in ..."

Check your sources.

You might wanna actually read about the PROTECT Act.

It was almost completely repealed to the point that images that don't involve real children are subject to the Miller Test for obscenity.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Messaggio originale di SlowMango:

A bare butt isn't considered CP.

Otherwise, parents who post pictures of their kids playing in sprinklers and such naked would be charged with distributing CP.

Do parents post pics of their kids having full blown sex. And the particular scenerio you mention is a fine line. If you post naked pics of your child you should go to jail for one and technically, under us law as it's written it is cp. So stop defendong cp, its absolutely disgusting.

As you stated, no sex is shown.

Also, it is not considered CP. It needs to be in a sexual context. Playing in a yard sprinkler is not sexual.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Messaggio originale di Ben Lubar:

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Do parents post pics of their kids having full blown sex, because this game also shows a 16 year old having full blown sex. And the particular scenerio you mention is a fine line. If you post naked pics of your child you should go to jail for one and technically, under us law as it's written it is cp. So stop defendong cp, its absolutely disgusting.

The implication that someone is having sex off-screen is not pornography.

This is the BG3 thing all over again.

[❤ Sly Succubus ❤]

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Messaggio originale di ❤ Succubus with BFG ❤:

In the United States law the depictions of REAL PHOTOS are against the law, this does not apply to digital items such as those of games, movies or media that do not feature real life people, the law would however fall to 5 questions

1: Is the picture or media of a real person in any way?
2: Is the picture or media related to any human that exists?
3: Is it nudity or direct sexual conduct? (Note: Within bylaws that the United States reserves the right to waver action suites against claims of these types of its simply nudity)
4: If the prior three standards are not met, is it of any real person from history?
5: If none of the prior four standards apply, is the figure in any way shape or form to realistic?

If the media does not fall within those standard laws which for the record wikipedia is full of nonsense as it ignores all the regulations entirely then what you claimed is not only wrong, but liable for slander which can be prosecuted at the courts authority for false report of child sexual endangerment laws.

Very incorrect

"The law enacted 18 U.S.C. § 1466A, which criminalizes material that has "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting" that "depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is obscene" or "depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in ..."

Check your sources.

Bro posted 1466 the law on transportation of porn and not 2256-8

The fact that I know congressional law better then you and the direct US-18 citation is rather funny, but hey thats what I get for being on Pixiv which keeps its notifications on to tell users when laws are changed and links to them

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Messaggio originale di Ben Lubar:

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Do parents post pics of their kids having full blown sex, because this game also shows a 16 year old having full blown sex. And the particular scenerio you mention is a fine line. If you post naked pics of your child you should go to jail for one and technically, under us law as it's written it is cp. So stop defendong cp, its absolutely disgusting.

The implication that someone is having sex off-screen is not pornography.

According to imdb its not off screen. I dont know, i wouldnt touch that trash with a ten foot pole.

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Messaggio originale di ❤ Succubus with BFG ❤:

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Very incorrect

"The law enacted 18 U.S.C. § 1466A, which criminalizes material that has "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting" that "depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is obscene" or "depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in ..."

Check your sources.

Bro posted 1466 the law on transportation of porn and not 2256-8

The fact that I know congressional law better then you and the direct US-18 citation is rather funny, but hey thats what I get for being on Pixiv which keeps its notifications on to tell users when laws are changed and links to them

Im canadian. Im using us law since valve operates out of us. Want to discuss canadian cp laws? Either way, you guys defending this is sickening.

[Ben Lubar]

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Messaggio originale di Ben Lubar:

The implication that someone is having sex off-screen is not pornography.

According to imdb its not off screen. I dont know, i wouldnt touch that trash with a ten foot pole.

It's available on Steam, Xbox, Playstation, and Nintendo's stores. Do you really think all four of those companies would be selling something if it contained something as clearly illegal as child pornography?

[❤ Sly Succubus ❤]

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Messaggio originale di ❤ Succubus with BFG ❤:

Bro posted 1466 the law on transportation of porn and not 2256-8

The fact that I know congressional law better then you and the direct US-18 citation is rather funny, but hey thats what I get for being on Pixiv which keeps its notifications on to tell users when laws are changed and links to them

Im canadian. Im using us law since valve operates out of us law. Want to discuss canadian cp laws? Either way, this is sickening.

I mean I would however you just killed your entire battle by saying Canada. In Canada the Age of Consent is 16. So that girl is 16? Well guess what, by your nations legal age clause, they are an adult so you just voided your entire conversation here by using the literal laws of your nation for girls that are literally by your nations law, legal.

That fact alone means I didn't need to try anything because in Canada its not even CP, its just outright porn at that point but hey, thats Canadian law as you asked.

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Messaggio originale di Ben Lubar:

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

According to imdb its not off screen. I dont know, i wouldnt touch that trash with a ten foot pole.

It's available on Steam, Xbox, Playstation, and Nintendo's stores. Do you really think all four of those companies would be selling something if it contained something as clearly illegal as child pornography?

Yes. Non sensical argument.

[Ben Lubar]

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Messaggio originale di Ben Lubar:

It's available on Steam, Xbox, Playstation, and Nintendo's stores. Do you really think all four of those companies would be selling something if it contained something as clearly illegal as child pornography?

Yes. Non sensical argument.

If you think that every game store in the world is selling child pornography, you're existing in a different enough world from the one I've been in all my life for me to have an intelligent conversation with you about this.

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Messaggio originale di ❤ Succubus with BFG ❤:

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Im canadian. Im using us law since valve operates out of us law. Want to discuss canadian cp laws? Either way, this is sickening.

I mean I would however you just killed your entire battle by saying Canada. In Canada the Age of Consent is 16. So that girl is 16? Well guess what, by your nations legal age clause, they are an adult so you just voided your entire conversation here by using the literal laws of your nation for girls that are literally by your nations law, legal.

That fact alone means I didn't need to try anything because in Canada its not even CP, its just outright porn at that point but hey, thats Canadian law as you asked.

Really? Eww, gross.

"Child Pornography, according to s.163.1 of the Criminal Code, encompasses any visual, written, or audio material displaying or depicting a person under 18 engaged in sexual activity or showing their genitals"

This guy thinks age of consent has anything to do with cp... Sickening.

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Messaggio originale di Ben Lubar:

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Yes. Non sensical argument.

If you think that every game store in the world is selling child pornography, you're existing in a different enough world from the one I've been in all my life for me to have an intelligent conversation with you about this.

Unfortunately its everywhere and accepted. Just look at the people defending it in this post. Its not uncommon.

[Ben Lubar]

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Messaggio originale di ❤ Succubus with BFG ❤:

I mean I would however you just killed your entire battle by saying Canada. In Canada the Age of Consent is 16. So that girl is 16? Well guess what, by your nations legal age clause, they are an adult so you just voided your entire conversation here by using the literal laws of your nation for girls that are literally by your nations law, legal.

That fact alone means I didn't need to try anything because in Canada its not even CP, its just outright porn at that point but hey, thats Canadian law as you asked.

Really? Eww, gross.

"Child Pornography, according to s.163.1 of the Criminal Code, encompasses any visual, written, or audio material displaying or depicting a person under 18 engaged in sexual activity or showing their genitals"

This guy thinks age of consent has anything to do with cp... Sickening.

Were the fictional people in the game filming the sex? Do you see genitals in the game? Do you see literally any part of the body that wouldn't be visible at a public swimming pool?