Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
I don't think you're understanding what I'm saying. They have the capacity to simply not update the client for certain platforms. The windows 7 and 8.1 clients did not receive the January update, because they understood that the new version of chromium is incompatible. They can just maintain this "do not update" flag or however they're doing it for outdated operating systems so that they do not receive updates that are known to brick them, the same way they put that little banner at the top that says "steam will stop running on Windows xyz in 0 days."
If they just don't push an update to us, we can continue using Steam until they break something on their end that prevents an out-of-date client from communicating with the servers.
It'd be a lot of work for something that's really out of their wheelhouse. They already have to maintain Steam and everything built on top of it - it would be asking a lot from them to either start maintaining an outdated fork of Chromium on their own, or to switch to an alternative that lacks new features and security patches for the sake of retaining a constantly shrinking userbase.
I mean, if we look at both OSes then 8.1 is a much better OS under the hood and I would also say probably the fastest modern Windows release.
I certainly believe that if Microsoft didn't destroy the UI i.e forcing a mobile UI on desktop/laptop users then everyone would have ditched 7 right away
Chrome 110+ does use sandboxing and other functions that are only available in Win10 and 11. Supermium does away without those by using its workarounds
Workarounds that Google won't support and other vendors like Valve, Discord etc won't do due to the guidelines
true, never have seen surch os, too bad i discovered it too late else it would have been my choice over w7 without any problems ... minus the ugly tiles xd
I used 8.1 from like 2013 until 2016. lovely experience and also was really speedy even on HDDs and systems with low RAM counts tho once I got an SSD. I just moved to 10 as I usually prefer to be on the latest version available at all times.
10 on HDDs as boot drives is simply unusable