Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
They're perfectly profitable as-is & so are the Developers whom will make more with 1 copy sold than being in a 'game pass'. "If it isn't broken, don't fix it".
GabeN doesn't want to make his own.
And GabeN would work with MS to bring Gamepass to Steam, if they want to.
https://www.pcgamer.com/valve-has-no-plans-for-a-steam-pass-but-would-help-microsoft-put-game-pass-on-steam/
GabeN doesn't want to fork out millions to devs/pubs to have them on a Game Pass.
Now split all of those games by number of games available through it in a full year. Now take 30% of a cut off of the profits and the rest of the 70% is divided among the Developers of those other games. Not much compared to selling one single copy, is it? Ends up being 8c or 14c per dev per year for xbox/pc games available if you're paying 50/Yr. You'd need a lot of subscribers to make a fair income for all parties.
Now Any developer can create a gamepass for their games. EA does that with EA Play. Most however prefer to actually get paid reasonably for their games.
Yep, wouldn't be smart for steam to organize something that would undercut its own profits. They already offer the ability for anyone to offer it thru steam, including microsoft. So if others want to spend the time and money negotiating wtih hundreds of different developers and working out the vastly tangled payment schemes they can and steam will take their 30%.
I always like the "In 20XX" posts, where that years is some kind of imagined deadline where every business should be copying what other businesses are doing.
Valve, MS, Ubisoft, EA are all different companies. They're allowed to do different things.
Whatever you assume and whatever arbitrary deadlines you assumed your assumptions should have been fulfilled by is all just stuff you made up without any information.
Why would you think that? What information did you use to come to those conclusions. Who at Valve led you to believe Valve would be following suit with their own subscription service? Since you didn't really have any information, why did you think it was appropriate to just assume it? "It would be nice if?"
Yeah, maybe. I don't mind subscriptions myself. But I don't assume everyone must implement them either.
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/0/3874841497810497925/
Valve made own decision. It paid off.
Also, why noone mentioned, there is a "Valve-Gamepass" allready? It's called the orange box.
Because The Orange Box is not a subscription.