Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Let's bring true horror back on Halloween by killing off Windows 7 on that faithful day.
What do you mean?
In none of those threads did I ever agree with the fact that staying on Windows 7 was a smart move. In fact - at one point, I made it very clear that it was my personal opinion that staying on Windows 7 because 10 was 'spyware' was bunk. Because all the same telemetry was also added to an update to Windows 7. A core update to the Windows Update installer, which you had to install to even be able to continue to install security updates.
In fact - Windows 7 spies harder, because it had the same telemetry added without explicit UI controls to turn it (partially) off, like Windows 10 at least does offer.
What I did argue in those threads is that a court might judge Valve to not be 100% in the clear wrt their update policy thanks to the UCTD, and I emphasized the negative consequences of getting a ball rolling on that in a high-profile legal case -- which might end in tougher legislation and crackdown; i.e. over-regulation. That's what government excels at where it concerns IT and entertainment media; and especially in video-games, where both meet. And it's something which nobody here wants to happen. (The well-known maxim: 'be careful what you wish for,' applies.)
And a few times I made note of the fact that one way out of the whole predicament, would be if Valve would just spend the minimal effort on a limited-function 'down-level' client that can only be used to log in; install; and start games via a surrogate generated Steam account ID linked to the main account, with separate credentials so it'd not be a big problem if it gets compromised. No online activity; no market; no community; no nothing. Just the bare minimum you'd be legally entitled to: access to the content you purchased.
I've also never made any secret of the fact that Valve's update policy wrt Chromium is terrible - and that supporting or not supporting Windows 7 was never part of the reasoning. Because if it was they wouldn't have had to stay on Chromium v85 as long as they have, but could've updated all the way to v109 without issue.
Which would've resolved at least two more important and dangerous vulnerabilities. One in the V8 JS engine, which can be used for remote code execution. And one in Chromium itself which allows bypassing the same-origin policy and stealing credentials.
The difference is:
those weren't under active exploitation. And were fairly hard to exploit, needing specifically tailored code. The libwebp and libvpx exploits are under active exploitation in the wild; and are comparatively very simple to exploit.
Now add also the fact that since August there has been a sharp uptick of developer accounts being compromised; and rationally I'd say: the needs of the many start outweighing the needs of the few.
I personally don't know one end of CEF from the other, and tend to rely on who makes the most rational points with the least amount of hyperbole, like you did.
In simpler words - Thanks for the info.
Don't worry you can keep pounding sand, I'm sure that fix all life problems lol.
I understand the reason why you agree with the OP, I just found your "yes, please" a bit funny :)
"This Halloween, we (Valve) bring back the true meaning of horror... by removing Windows 7 support extra early."