Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
Diskussionsregeln
Diesen Beitrag melden
Mein gott someone knows! Thank you, good sir, you are a god amongst men... for having common sense. <3
These people will go to any length to defend themselves, however, and I can assure you they will just spew out more crap in a tiny attempt to keep their arguement relevant. :\
if where we talking consoles gaming then yes ... when a game glitch and crash it's more often a deffective disc or badly made games , but then we have to consider the whole different sets of hardwares and OS availables to gamers there day's.
and then some other just plainly complain about a game quality even thru the graphics are obviously built for low end pc's and their only arguments is ''all games should be able to use my computer at it's maximum capacity because I've paid 2000$ for it'' and I don't want game that look like Android or ps3 port on steam.
'a game that delete it's own save file' ... that thing remind me so much of how peoples don't have a clue of how GFLW work and never noticed the obvious function to create a offline profile allowed most (90%) of these games to use the save function properly without having to log online , yet threads are regulary created on various forums from peoples complaining they can't save and the game socks when in reality ... it's their own fault.
so sometime a games is really totaly bad and sometime it's just the players who din't take the time to look at what is causing their problems with a given game , there are so much variable that can make a game playable or uplayable on a technical view on top even without counting the personal taste that a player has that I can't think of how someone could quantify a game quality ...
-in short-
w'ere not talking about beans and carrots , w'ere talking about codes and complex logics ... the only way to make a game run the same on all different computer is to ... test it manually on every single computers that it's been targeted to and even then ... you will have peoples complaining the game don't work even if their hardware is at fault.
-in even shorter-
yes ... sometime the game is a scrap and other time it's just the players that are acting up , not knowing how to use their computers or talking on their high horse like their opinions about a game is not an opinion but a fact.
It is keeping your head on your shoulders instead of up in the sky. Once again....you use rhetoric that is nothing but hyperbole and you haven't actually conributed a single thing in here except...'our taste should be better'. Tha tis the point....you only buy what you want. This fantasy store you dreamt up doesn't exist. And if it did.....you would be crying about the lack of games being released.
If you buy a game that has "OVERWHELMINGLY NEGATIVE" as the review average on the right....you deserve the crappiest game on the planet. Glitches and all.
And this is what I am talking about.
You have no counter argument, nothing rational to say and no real goal in mind. You just don't want to see stuff you do not like. Which is a personal problem. And if you can't read a simple review...we shouldn't be taking your advice on anything....ever.
>Ignored.
Welp, i won the internet. Bye.
kek
Amazon sells loads of low-quality merchandise. They exercise zero quality control over ebooks (and too many of those ARE "zero quality," unless you've got a sex-with-monsters fetish). There's also huge amounts of bad mass-market books, videos and music on there.
Amazon CAN'T effectively do quality control on the items they and their partner stores sell, because they're selling millions of different items from thousands of vendors. They're a mass-market on a scale even greater than Steam. Do you honestly believe that someone at Amazon checks every single item out that's marketed through the site? I'm not entirely sure they look that closely at the stuff they themselves sell. Thing is, there's enough retail competition that the mass market can judge whether this or that humidifier or curling iron works well enough.
Steam is currently the market leader for PC gaming. Not their "pretty much just our own stuff" competitors Origin or UPlay (and while QC would be easier for those two, meh). Certainly not Desura or GOG.
If you put a bit of time into letting Steam know what you like (by wishlisting or buying) and don't like (by clicking "Not Interested" or by not viewing) it'll get the picture of what kind of customer you are and present things you'd like better. Look at it this way, if they do that poorly at it, you're probably spending less here. If they do it more poorly than one or more of their competitors, they lose their spot on top.
If Steam's methods of presenting things has one noticeable flaw, it's assuming that we all are prone to liking what large numbers of others like and buy. I don't know how to break it to a few of you, but those inexpensive, indie and/or Early Access games are pretty clearly selling in decent numbers. Steam's clearly not pushing something hard that nobody wants. If they did so, the AAA companies would have the economic clout with them to get that stuff pushed WAAAAY down. Games at the right price sell in good enough numbers to make it worth their time and effort to promote them.
Are there buggy games? Sure, it is part and parcel of the industry. Will games be released with game stopping bugs? Again, sure. A good developer will fix them. If not, people will remember and may or may not buy from said developer again.
As far as your claim to McGames on Steam, get used to it. From the sounds of things, the only games you like come from large publishers. Newsflash, they are not releasing as many games as they used to. This year, you will be lucky to get 33 new games from them and at least 3 of them will not even be released on Steam due to being from Electronic Arts. While you wait on a few games you may want to buy out of those 33, which may not even be worth the $40-60 they ask for them, others will be playing something out of the other 120 games that will be released by smaller developers.
The other guys think they're saying they want Steam to lock everything down and stop letting people put games on it period or something, so they naturally don't listen.
But ooooh well
Yea....it is so easy for games like that to get on Steam. There have been so many! Like.....2. The issue is that the world isn't sunshine and rainbows and your "Quality Control" would end up screwing more stuff up instead of making anything better.
Note that (I heard) Steam just broke the 5000 title mark so 50 is just 1% of the store's offerings, but it's still a significant number, more than the handful of examples that people keep citing. Two posts up is the first time I'd heard of Slaughtering Grounds, but I usually just hear examples like Bad Rats, Air Control, Desert Gunner, Grass Simulator, The War Z, Day One Garry's Incident, etc. -- just the same ones over and over again. Sometimes I'm wondering whether people just hear about the bad games, see a few Youtube videos, and then start calling it a problem themselves without having run into it themselves.