Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Este tema ha sido cerrado 
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
I honestly have no idea why CP2077 did target that OS/DX11 feature level to begin with. Utter waste of time and effort as DX11_0 hardware has barely ran the game to begin with.
That's the thing, you can't make advancements in gaming or technology if try and promise to support the old with similar performance, just not feasible.
Personally I'd rather prefer software developers would push the envelope more. This day and age is the only time I've seen us actually being able to max game settings with the hardware we have, sure it needs the high end stuff, but even back in the day with triple SLI GTX 680's I couldn't max some games lol.
Graphical advancements have became far smaller over the years and the focus has been shifted overall to other technologies such as DLSS and FSR
We will see improvements with graphics in the form of ray-tracing but it will take a long while until it will be viable for most people tbh
edit:
whoops, hit the button
anyways, this came up before
it will come up again
if it was illegal and if lawsuits work/worked, they would have already stopped doing this
(Wow, it's weird to see a post now ending when Tito's mod hat was still on.)
You do realise there's a REASON why so many folk are still reluctant to 'upgrade' to Windows10, even so many years after they basically tried to FORCE it on us... perhaps if Microsoft would learn to actually, y'know, FIX their sh*t or whatever, maybe people would be more willing to take the plunge..? Just a thought.
Side note - Valve really tried to sneak this in under the radar, huh..? Frankly, if I hadn't stumbled on this & similar treads completely by accident, I'd - & I'm sure many others(!) - have probably been none the wiser... Talk about a d*ck move.
It happened before.
Where do you think the refund policy came from?
That had nothing to do with the case in Australia. That one was about Valve having misinformed Australian consumers about their given right to a well-functioning product that conforms to contract and the remedies available to them where that is not the case -- much like the legislation in the EU actually.
The refund policy has nothing to do with that. The refund policy is a substitute for the EU right of withdrawal: a right that on any distance sale, consumers have a 14 day window of time after receiving their purchase to try it out and if they find it doesn't meet their expectations in any way, withdraw from the purchase - i.e. send the item back and be refunded. This right was baked into the laws on distance sales as a substitute for the consumer being able to take an up close look at goods in stores when you'd buy from brick&mortar.
Of course, for some markets that 14 day period creates problems. Especially for video games where it can turn into, basically, a free 2 week rental. So the law had an escape hatch built in: under certain conditions traders distributing digital content digitally - i.e. distance sale - could demand consumers waive their right of withdrawal before they'd receive the content they bought access to.
But in return the EU in no small terms made it clear that traders should only make use of this ability in so far as it would be necessary for them to safeguard their business model. And they had better make damn well sure to introduce their own alternative procedure in spirit of the right of withdrawal to safeguard the consumer rights that the right of withdrawal was originally enacted for in law. 'Or else.'
And that's how you got your 2 hours played / 14 days owned - no-questions-asked refund window.
Just like the people who still use xp on there system, uninstall steam or upgrade. I thought win 98 was there best os ;)
Totally agree with you about a refund though. You could build a gaming rig pretty cheap if you time buying hardware when sales or on. AMD have a new mb cpu combo so the last generation stuff price will drop. Time it for a sale or your going to be stuck in console hell with the dodgy controllers with overpriced games ;)
annoying isn't it having to upgrade when there is no real need ;)
"Is it hard to develop for this platform?" - no, it's old and set in stone, it's easy.
"Do we have the money?" - yes
"Do at least a few hundred thousand, maybe some million or more customers use this platform?" - yes
"well then, just give the customers what they want, it's not our job to tell them what os to use, we're a game sales platform"
kek.
Sure it's weird that they're ending support in early 2024, but hey, Valve is allowed legally to no longer support old operating systems.
And right now, Windows 7 is older than Dirt.
There is no excuse to not update to windows 10, at all. EVER.
Mostly because it's still free.
You just have to do a bit of google searching.
Also, despite all the complaints about Windows 10, it works very well.
Using Windows 7 right now is like dropping Cesium in a cup of water you're holding in your hands.
I.E A really bad idea. Cesium tends to violently explode in water.
Security flaws are a nightmare, and every operating system dies eventually.
Even Windows 10 will die in about 8 years.
Knowing Microsoft.
But really, there is no valid complaint about this.
NO laws are broken.