Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
You also said it in this reply.
It does not mater how you said it you still said it.
didnt say anything besides what i wrote (ie.... said nothing about "making gamers happy").
bye, wont reply to you again, have a nice day
They are in China. China has ZERO copyright laws. It's sad but they can't get in any trouble.
I really hope Aliens don't come to Earth just yet.
Lets wait people to cry about privacy invastion
Dont forget:
- Easy Anti-Cheat by Epic Games, Inc. - USA
- PunkBuster by Even Balance, Inc.- USA
- BattlEye by BattlEye Innovations. - Germany
- nProtect GameGuard by INCA Internet Co., Ltd. - South Korea
- Xigncode3 by Wellbia.com Co., Ltd. - South Korea
- Denuvo Anti-Cheat by Denuvo Software Solutions GmbH (Irdeto) - Austria
- Vanguard by Riot Games, Inc. - USA
- Valve Anti Cheat - Valve Corporation - USA
and many more. ""WARNING! product XY installs highly invasive kernel-level spyware" are well and good, but I think there are a lot of double standards and politically motivated contributions at work here.There is also a lack of evidence for everything else that is often criticized. Besides, why people even buy/play games with anti-cheat if they don't like it? And why are these products were not removed from the respective library?
Questions, about questions...
Post some concrete data logs about this highly invasive spyware. Post evidence of how data is misused in this context.
You first.
Recognizing kernel level cheats usually requires kernel access. Without personal data (unique identifiers, whether software or hardware) and deeper system modifications, such a thing is not even possible. Moreover, Valve is forced to go with the technology in this area.
Otherwise, feel free to post more intel (as the one who always presents himself as a developer with the attitude of knowing more as others). We can also shift the burden of proof.
I'm already getting my modern shooter fix with BF 2042's bot matches. As I have no interest in the multiplayer section of those games.
I highlighted the key words for you to understand.