Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The author of this topic has marked a post as the answer to their question.
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
14 
Report this post
Of course, I get that all progrms leave traces behind, but ACE crosses a line for many players, including me. If you've had a different experience, that's great, but I think it's fair to warn others about potential issues so they can make an informed decision
Calling it hypocritical assumes I blindly accept the same practices from other games, which I don’t. I evaluate every case individually. If a game's anti-cheat crosses the line, I’ll call it out—regardless of the title. ACE, in my opinion, pushes boundaries that shouldn't be normalized. Fair enough?
This isn’t about residual files; it’s about how ACE continues to function and create issues long after it’s supposed to be gone. If other anti-cheats behave the same way, I'd call them out too. The line is drawn when something becomes intrusive enough to disrupt unrelated programs. That’s a boundary ACE clearly crosses. 🙄
As for your comment about Windows, Google, and War Thunder it’s a bit of a stretch, don’t you think? Using those platforms is a calculated trade-off. They don’t actively break functionality on my system like ACE does. Comparing a game’s intrusive anti-cheat to an operating system or a search engine is like comparing apples to oranges. 🍎🍊
But hey, if you’re okay with software behaving like that, more power to you. I just prefer to be a bit more cautious when something messes with my system to that extent. 🤔
Most of these "very effective kernel level anticheats" just don't prevent cheaters, they always find a workaround.
Gaming is infested with cheaters, especially the fps genre, there has to be something more effective than data mining anticheats.
I don't even think they are data mining lol. You people are more paranoid than me and I smoke weed everyday lol.
Also smoking weed every day is very unhealthy, you should consult a doctor for that lol.
And right there in the OP a whole lot of false information. Abd them he decides to use another false information comment as his highlighted comment.
The real facts are it does uninstall when you uninstall the game. I tested this myself with Delta Force and then playing Fortnite.
The anti cheat is only running when the game is running. Tested this myself by exiting out of Delta Force and saw nothing running.
The anti cheat doesn't conflict with other anti cheats. Tested this myself by exiting out of the game and then running Fortnite, had no issues at all.
There is zero proof about it collecting non game data and sending it to anyone.
The fact that it uninstalls when you uninstall the game is good for you, but the issue isn’t just about installation it’s about how the software behaves even after the game is closed. 🚨 Some users report that ACE doesn’t completely shut down, and they still encounter problems with residual services running in the background, leading to system instability or conflicts with other programs
Also, about the data collection: while there may not be clear proof in your case, there’s enough concern among the community regarding the level of access ACE requires to function. Some people might not be comfortable with it, and that’s okay. It’s better to be cautious than to assume everything is fine just because it works in your specific scenario.
In the end, every user has their own experience and their own level of comfort when it comes to these things. It’s not about false information; it’s about different perspectives. We all just want to ensure we’re making informed decisions. 👍💡
Wow, Mohammed Al-Hussaini, it looks like you’ve cracked the code of modern gaming vulnerabilities! Let’s take a moment to admire your bravery in sticking it to a free game with a kernel-level anti-cheat while conveniently ignoring the giant elephants in the room—like CVE-2024-44308 on Apple devices or CVE-2024-43093 for Android. Because clearly, the safest option is to junk everything you own, right?
And just so we're on the same page, your outrage isn’t about a widespread industry issue (because kernel-level anti-cheat is practically standard now); it’s specifically about Delta Force—a free game, no less. If you’re so horrified, why even install it in the first place? Did someone at Activision or EA slip you a care package for this hit job? Or are we supposed to believe you're a selfless champion for the greater good of gamers everywhere?
Pro tip: if you really cared about improving the situation, you’d send your very serious concerns to the developers instead of broadcasting them here to drum up bad press. But hey, that wouldn’t get as many thumbs up from the keyboard warrior crowd, right?
Oh, and since you’re so worried about privacy and system stability, maybe stop playing any modern game with Easy Anti-Cheat or BattlEye, which also run at the kernel level. By your logic, half the games in your library should be uninstalled immediately—unless you think Delta Force is somehow the sole harbinger of doom in your perfectly vulnerable system.
So here’s a thought: either contribute something constructive or don’t bother. Because whining about industry standards while ignoring context isn’t helping anyone, least of all your credibility.
First, let me clarify: my concerns aren’t about targeting a specific game, nor am I under the illusion that kernel-level anti-cheat is unique to Delta Force. The issue here is transparency and implementation. Many industry-standard anti-cheats are upfront about their behavior and risks, providing clear options for users to mitigate issues. ACE, on the other hand, feels rushed in execution, with several users (myself included) noticing residual processes even after uninstalling the game. If addressing these concerns is “whining,” I’d argue it’s the same “whining” that’s led to better consumer protection across various industries.
Secondly, no one is suggesting ditching all modern games or tossing out devices, for that matter. But raising awareness about potential risks isn’t “drumming up bad press”; it’s giving people a chance to make informed choices. Isn’t that the foundation of any healthy community? Or do we just sit back and accept everything without question? 🤔
As for contacting developers, that’s a fair point and something I’ve already done. But forums like these are also valuable for sparking conversations and pushing for accountability. After all, if nobody discussed issues publicly, how would change ever happen? And let’s not pretend that “constructive” criticism and “bad press” are mutually exclusive—they often go hand in hand.
Lastly, if we’re talking about credibility, maybe it’s worth considering whether mocking someone for raising a legitimate concern says more about the person raising the issue or the one dismissing it. I’m here to discuss, not to grandstand or tear anyone down. Perhaps we can shift this energy into something more productive? 🤷♂️