安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Per device. It's still a terrible move though, and even if they backpedal entirely the trust between Unity and it's users are now broken.
And as for Unity imploding making EGS have any more chance of eating Steam market share? Not at all. Game engines is a completely different space and things like Godot or a few dozen other options can quite easily take up the slack there. The engine market is not the same market that finished games reside in.
There is a whole bunch of engines people could use. A good amount of devs already stated they'd switch to Godot. Besides that there are O3DE, Armory3D, CryEngine, id tech 7 and several others. In theory Valve could even try to promote Source2 to make it more popular.
Unreal will remain the biggest threat because it's the path of least resistance to a dev team.
The money charged may cost developers some money, but that still is a very low % of the total revenue stream. Think something like credit card % charged to merchants on every sale, and you get the idea.
I do not think Epic would do that to Indie developers with a much more limited market than Steam. Much more likely is Unreal eventually adopting the same model.
Even so, I will never use Unity for my project after hearing this, even if they changed their wordings. This, to me, is one of the scummiest things I've heard.
https://youtu.be/Le79j1ZSfKk?si=KHv-kNbkMh2oCJrn
As for Epic, it's not far fetched to say that locking UE to EGS is an option they could take after this debacle, it's one surefire way to gain foothold in their battle with steam and other PC stores.
Especially given that with the mass exodus out of unity, their game engine would have a somewhat near monopoly as an alternative, I know there are other engines out there but some aren't even suited to do many tipes of the games that have been made with unity in the last decade, some may not even have the recognition that game dev would see.
There's another one.
In other words, someone pays for what someone else does.
XXXXXXX Removed to protect the Developer XXXXXX
Subject: Does this game use Unity?
As per subject.
Yes Unity HDRP
I am sorry mate, but I can no longer support Unity after the last few days of rubbish.
I hope the game goes well for you and your team.
Good luck.[/quote]
I am just going to leave this here, Seems some Developers dont want the word getting out on new EA titles.
Epic on the other hand, I think would do well to take this opportunity to make Unreal Engine more accessible, since unlike their store, it's more of a sustainable project that admittedly has a lot of cool tech behind it.
I think Epic's exclusivity is at a very low influence right now, at least until Assassin's Creed Mirage, or Dwarves in Moria, or some other game turns out to be a massive success there.
So I don't see indie developers taking them up on that offer, but if they want to give UE a go then I don't see why they shouldn't, as long as it doesn't lock them to just the EGS storefront.
They are giving away games for free for years - I have a few free games per week from them and I have played zero because I just don't want to install their stuff.
They could make every new game an exclusive for a year and wouldn't make a difference to me.