Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Hozzászólási szabályok és irányelvek
Hozzászólás jelentése
If we do that the problem will go away.
One, the end user agreement doesn't create law, it however must be lawful. So the end user agreement can be challenged. Also, this agreement can be broken by either party at any time. So, stop telling everyone that the moment you agreed to the agreement that it's set in stone forever and ever and you can never prevail against it. That you have no standing. This isn't true.
Two, the end user agreement is the license. It's not part of the license, it is the license. It is the wording that formulates the agreement we all signed and sign. It's not a good or a product but an agreement. And understanding between parties. That's all it is.
And that means, I can't own it. I don't own it and here is even more proof. If I owned it, because I bought it, then I can do what I want with it. So, since it gives me access to a product I don't own, I should be able to give it to someone else for as long as the license is valid. In fact, the agreement says that my account and all that is connected to it is nontransferable, so there, I can't, nor do I, own a license. This license is a limited use license, or agreement, that is only valid until the end user agreement comes to an end and that is spelled out in the agreement.
So then, what am I paying for. Well, what you're really paying for is a subscription, but not like the kind we might know as a normal subscription. Hold on, what? That's right, but it's packaged different and they don't tell you this. Instead of paying for a subscription that gives you access to many games, you are paying to get access, a subscription, to one game. The game you are paying money to access. And what is the cost of that subscription, the price of the game.
So, what you have paid for is many subscriptions.
But all of this sounds familiar, meaning, subscribing to access and play a game like The crew and many more, right?
So, yeah, Houston we have a problem. I wasn't subscribing to anything when I paid the money. And furthermore, I wasn't told that this is what I was doing.
Just mind blowing how easy some people would give up rights, be mislead to believe otherwise or just simply like to lick the boot. Similar to the "warranty void" stickers... It's fact that you can open and maintain/service and repair your hardware as expected without loosing any warranty. A trivial warranty sticker and a trivial ToS is all the same bull.
If they can show that your repairs or attempt at repairs cause damage to the hardware, your warranty is voided. Which is legal since you literally broke the warranty.
It's funny how many of you blindly follow companies and now lash out to drive attention away from that. The irony of your insults towards others is quite big.
The "Warranty void if removed" sticker is because user damage is a thing for physical products, so servicing defects via repair or replacement for unexpected issues is significantly cheaper compared to repairing or replacing user-caused damages by being within the warranty period.
Some companies also do "Warranty void if removed" or "Warranty void if seal is broken" for products that are legitimately dangerous to service by people lacking knowledge/tools to safely work on something, such as a power supply which can be lethal if you don't know what you're doing. Some companies may also put "Warning" "Dangerous" with a lethal notation including voiding the warranty if opened to deter self-caused user death and as an overall deterrent and liability prevention source.
Those are two very different things as well, and they are not good comparisons.
I used to inspect things, warranties were definitely voided and people would have to pay for proper repairs of stuff they damaged. Companies often inspect and photograph before doing anything with a product received for the purpose of repair/replacement.
That isn't entirely true.
You know part of me wonders if this law may have been a way for the courts to basically cut down on the frivolous cases of people trying to claim the games are their property becayuse they didn't understand that they were buying a license.
This doesn't just apply to users mind you. Any repair place you take the device to will wind up in the same boat. But if you're taking it to a professuional, thatb professional is by law required to place some warranty and guarantee on their work. SO basically the warranty you get from the repair technician will replace the warranty you get from the manufactuirer or company.
It's when users who think they know what they don't know go fiddling around inside a thing that you get damage. Which means as a user if you see that sticker you best be damned sure of your abilities.