Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
One might have a more positive inclination in it's tone. But that's entirely why the author chose to use it over the other word. To say all minorities are not allowed to be included in the first wave of feminist movement is couching the language as much as possible to not blame first wave feminists too much on what they did (they were wholly against intersectionality).
https://www.history.com/news/feminism-four-waves
For instance, in this article here written in the first wave feminism historical section that the movement "excluded" black feminists from the movement itself. So D.Flame getting hung up on the word choice is some weird semantics. It's pointless and just in denial of historical writings on the subject.
Good lord. You think people who are 'trans exclusionary' are part of a movement that is defined as 'Inclusive' because of its pro-LGBT, pro-minority, pro-disability, etc foundations.
Please try to reconcile the common anti-woke belief that the new DA game is full of 'trans propaganda' due to 'DEI' with your belief that DEI is also full of people who hate trans people.
You are wasting your time. People like that user do not operate by any kind of real logic.
Everything gets bend to fit their singular world view.
I feel like TERFs would be more likely to be on the side that's against LGBT rights, not the side that contradicts the one opinion they hold.
And as long as we're defining the sides, on one side we have people who are gay, people who are black, people who are transgender, people who are women, etc. And on the other side, we have a bunch of people who get very upset when anyone who is any of those things has the audacity to exist within their line of sight, even in fiction.
The sides are not equivalent. One of them isn't even a side of an argument. I'll let you figure out which one.
Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist